Court: Compliance reached in education funding case
U.S. Court Watch
A long-running court case over the adequacy of education funding in Washington state has ended, with the state Supreme Court on
Thursday lifting its jurisdiction over the case and dropping daily sanctions after the Legislature funneled billions more dollars into public
schools.
The court's unanimous order came in response to lawmakers passing a supplemental budget earlier this year that the justices said was
the final step needed to reach compliance with a 2012 state Supreme Court ruling that found that K-12 school funding was inadequate.
Washington's Constitution states that it is the Legislature's "paramount duty" to fully fund the education system. The resolution of the
landmark case in Washington state comes as other states like Arizona, Oklahoma and Kentucky are now responding to calls for more
money to be allocated to education.
The state had been in contempt of court since 2014 for lack of progress on that ruling, and daily sanctions of $100,000 — allocated
specifically for education spending— had been accruing since August 2015.
"Reversing decades of underfunding has been among the heaviest lifts we've faced in recent years and required difficult and complex
decisions, but I'm incredibly proud and grateful for all those who came together on a bipartisan basis to get this job done," Washington
Gov. Jay Inslee said in a written statement.
Over the past few years, lawmakers had put significantly more money toward education costs like student transportation and classroom
supplies, but the biggest piece they needed to tackle to reach full compliance was figuring out how much the state must provide for
teacher salaries. School districts had paid a big chunk of those salaries with local property-tax levies, something the court said had to be
remedied.
In November, the court said a plan passed by the Legislature last year — which included a statewide property tax increase earmarked for
education — satisfied its earlier ruling, but justices took issue with the fact that the teacher salary component of the plan wasn't fully
funded until September 2019. This year, lawmakers expedited that timeframe to Sept. 1, 2018.
Democratic House Majority Leader Pat Sullivan said that the court's order was a relief, though he noted that legislative debates over
education funding aren't over. Sullivan said there is more work to be done on areas like special education, as well as recruiting and
retaining teachers.
Related listings
-
Judge bars deportations of Venezuelans from South Texas
U.S. Court Watch 05/07/2025A federal judge on Thursday barred the Trump administration from deporting any Venezuelans from South Texas under an 18th-century wartime law and said President Donald Trump’s invocation of it was “unlawful.”U.S. District Court Judg...
-
Wall Street falls for a second day ahead of Federal Reserve meeting
U.S. Court Watch 05/04/2025Wall Street is pointing toward losses Tuesday ahead of a two-day meeting of the Federal Reserve, which is facing the diametrically opposed challenges of potential inflation and a softening employment landscape.Futures for the S&P 500 lost 0.7% an...
-
Judge to weigh Louisiana AG’s challenge to city jail’s ‘sanctuary’ policy
U.S. Court Watch 04/22/2025Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill is pushing forward with her efforts to force Orleans Parish Sheriff Susan Hutson to drop a longtime policy that generally prohibits deputies from directly engaging in federal immigration enforcement within the c...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.