Court: Compliance reached in education funding case
U.S. Court Watch
A long-running court case over the adequacy of education funding in Washington state has ended, with the state Supreme Court on
Thursday lifting its jurisdiction over the case and dropping daily sanctions after the Legislature funneled billions more dollars into public
schools.
The court's unanimous order came in response to lawmakers passing a supplemental budget earlier this year that the justices said was
the final step needed to reach compliance with a 2012 state Supreme Court ruling that found that K-12 school funding was inadequate.
Washington's Constitution states that it is the Legislature's "paramount duty" to fully fund the education system. The resolution of the
landmark case in Washington state comes as other states like Arizona, Oklahoma and Kentucky are now responding to calls for more
money to be allocated to education.
The state had been in contempt of court since 2014 for lack of progress on that ruling, and daily sanctions of $100,000 — allocated
specifically for education spending— had been accruing since August 2015.
"Reversing decades of underfunding has been among the heaviest lifts we've faced in recent years and required difficult and complex
decisions, but I'm incredibly proud and grateful for all those who came together on a bipartisan basis to get this job done," Washington
Gov. Jay Inslee said in a written statement.
Over the past few years, lawmakers had put significantly more money toward education costs like student transportation and classroom
supplies, but the biggest piece they needed to tackle to reach full compliance was figuring out how much the state must provide for
teacher salaries. School districts had paid a big chunk of those salaries with local property-tax levies, something the court said had to be
remedied.
In November, the court said a plan passed by the Legislature last year — which included a statewide property tax increase earmarked for
education — satisfied its earlier ruling, but justices took issue with the fact that the teacher salary component of the plan wasn't fully
funded until September 2019. This year, lawmakers expedited that timeframe to Sept. 1, 2018.
Democratic House Majority Leader Pat Sullivan said that the court's order was a relief, though he noted that legislative debates over
education funding aren't over. Sullivan said there is more work to be done on areas like special education, as well as recruiting and
retaining teachers.
Related listings
-
US families contest Italian law restricting citizenship by descent in court
U.S. Court Watch 04/16/2026Two U.S. families went to Italy's highest court Tuesday to challenge the scope of a year-old law passed by Giorgia Meloni's government limiting citizenship claims to Italian descendants removed by more than two generations.Their lawyer, Marco Mellone...
-
Federal judge finds Pentagon is violating court order to restore access to reporters
U.S. Court Watch 04/13/2026A federal judge on Thursday ruled that the Defense Department is violating his earlier order to restore access to the Pentagon for reporters, a setback in the administration's efforts to impede the work of journalists.U.S. District Judge Paul Friedma...
-
Google, Meta, push back on addiction claims in landmark social media trial
U.S. Court Watch 02/15/2026Jurors in a landmark social media case that seeks to hold tech companies responsible for harms to children got their first glimpse into what will be a lengthy trial characterized by dueling narratives from the plaintiffs and the two remaining defenda...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.

