Another U.S. court rules against auto industry
Attorney Blogs
Another federal court has ruled against the auto industry in its attempt to block regulation of greenhouse gas pollution from cars.
The ruling today from U.S. District Judge Anthony Ishii in California supports a September decision by a federal judge in Vermont.
Both courts upheld the rights of states to use the federal Clean Air Act to control greenhouse gases from cars.
Steven Hinchman is a lawyer for the Conservation Law Foundation, which intervened in the Vermont case.
Hinchman points out that both the California and Vermont cases followed a U.S. Supreme Court decision in April that affirmed the government's power to regulate global warming pollution.
This is strike three for the automakers. They've now lost in this year alone three different federal cases trying to block regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles. When the best scientists in the whole world are saying this is an urgent crisis, and when the governments are responding, it's time for the automakers to quit litigating and start innovating and producing clean cars.
More than a dozen states have followed California's lead and have adopted tough new emissions standards.
Both Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell and Governor Jim Douglas praised the ruling.
They said the California decision upholds the right of states to require aggressive pollution control measures for vehicles.
Related listings
-
Florida Lawmakers Sue Dean, DNC
Attorney Blogs 10/04/2007[##_1L|1054328138.jpg|width="120" height="118" alt=""|_##]A federal lawsuit to be filed tomorrow by Florida lawmakers against Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean alleges that Dean and the national party are violating the equal protection provisions...
-
Too-close-to-call cases at Supreme Court
Attorney Blogs 10/01/2007[##_1L|1395673476.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]It is called the Supreme Court, but this year in key cases the institution might just as well be called the supreme realm of Justice Anthony Kennedy. Such is the power of the centrist swing vot...
-
Google Defends the DoubleClick Deal
Attorney Blogs 09/30/2007Google is watching you. But you already knew that. Every time you conduct a search using its search engine, Google keeps tabs—and uses the information to send you ads tailored to the interests and tastes suggested by your searches. Here's something y...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.