Rudy gives idea of ideal Supreme Court Justice
Attorney Blogs
[##_1L|1159121881.jpg|width="127" height="85" alt=""|_##]Rudy Giuliani pledged Wednesday to appoint Supreme Court justices in the model of conservatives Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, hoping to win over anti-abortion Republicans in this key first-caucus state. But Giuliani avoided any mention of whether he would seek to overutrn the Roe v. Wade abortion rights decision -- now potentially just one justice from being repealed -- insisting he would not have a litmus test on that or any other issue.
Giuliani named those two justices, along with President George W. Bush's two picks, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, as the kind of people he would put on the court. He said they don't try to write laws from the bench but only interpret the Constitution "in a way that will protect your rights and my rights. They will not get it into their heads that they're really legislators and they can go around changing things," Giuliani said.
Bush himself had mentioned Scalia and Thomas as his model judges during his 2000 campaign -- a move widely viewed as a way to signal conservatives that he would move the court rightward, including on Roe v. Wade.
But conservatives then knew that Bush was personally opposed to abortion. Giuliani is using a similar pledge to convince conservatives that he would look beyond his personal views in support of abortion rights in pickng justices, raising questions of whether it will be as effective an appeal.
Giuliani also defended his record of picking mostly Democratic judges as New York mayor, saying those people didn't decide constitutional issues but mainly presided over criminal cases.
Giuliani is making his first swing through heavilly Republican western Iowa today and tomorrow, seeking to convince voters he is not bypassing the state's January caucuses despite mixed signals from his campaign.
Related listings
-
Bush orders review of import safety
Attorney Blogs 07/18/2007[##_1L|1032482943.gif|width="135" height="114" alt=""|_##]United States President George W Bush has ordered a review of rules to ensure the safety of imports, after several scandals over fake or dangerous goods from China. The US has recently banned ...
-
Roberts court overrules respect for precedent
Attorney Blogs 07/07/2007[##_1L|1101344844.gif|width="135" height="114" alt=""|_##]President Bush has let down his core supporters in so many ways. There's the big federal deficit. The "war on terror" has degenerated into a civil war in Iraq. His failed let-them-stay immigra...
-
How law firms are failing New Orleans.
Attorney Blogs 07/06/2007[##_1L|1377148377.jpg|width="130" height="130" alt=""|_##]Law firms are the cavalry of the legal world. Disaster strikes, and the firms, with their thousands of lawyers and millions of dollars, ride into town to clean up the mess. But what happens wh...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.