Who is the Obama of Law Firms?
Attorney Blogs
The New York Observer has answered a burning political question that never occurred to us, at least until now: "If the major presidential candidates were top New York law firms, which ones would they be?"
Lawyers in New York - perhaps enjoying a bit more idle time than usual these days - energetically took up the question, offering all kinds of suggestions and nominations, David Lat wrote. Lawyers nationwide have showered Hillary Clinton with more campaign contributions than any other candidate, federal records show. In Mr. Lat's informal survey, though, when asked which firm most embodies Mrs. Clinton, the common answer from lawyers in her home state was "Not mine."
So how did the pairings shape up?
After some debate, Mr. Lat declared Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison the closest match for Mrs. Clinton. Why Paul Weiss? One anonymous lawyer at the firm suggested that, like the candidate, the firm had a reputation for being a bit, well, hard-driving. (The lawyer actually used a more colorful phrase.) "But those who know her - and us - know we are 'good people,'" the lawyer added.
Another lawyer nominated Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, the boutique firm known for advising in big mergers and defending chief executives under siege, as a match for Mrs. Clinton, suggesting they both had a "thorough command of the issues." This caused a Wachtell associate to snort back, "Can you picture Wachtell crying?"
Many lawyers pitched their employers as the Barack Obama of law firms, but Mr. Lat gave that title to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, a relatively young business-litigation firm where, according to a recent article in The New York Times, "flip-flops are acceptable footwear."
"Both seem to be the young, upstart contenders, trying to do things a new way," was how one observer put it.
On the Republican side, John McCain got paired with Cravath, Swaine & Moore, but only after plenty of jokes about being old - and at least one reference to torture.
Finding a match for Mitt Romney was apparently a cinch: It was Sullivan & Cromwell, a law firm that consistently ranks near the top of the merger advisory league tables. A former associate at the firm offered these common traits: "Very picture-perfect. Always willing to go with the highest bidder."
Related listings
-
Va. argues for unauthorized evidence
Attorney Blogs 01/14/2008The Supreme Court's long-running debate over the meaning of federalism took a new turn in a case the justices heard on Monday. The question was, What happens when a state chooses to give criminal suspects more protection than the federal Constitution...
-
Emerging markets fuel firms' global growth
Attorney Blogs 01/03/2008Chicago mayer Brown's global ambitions received a much-needed boost late last month when the Chicago law firm announced it will join forces with a 260-lawyer Hong Kong-based firm. The deal, a rare trans-Pacific legal merger, reflects how the forces o...
-
Lawyers try to catch up in tech world
Attorney Blogs 12/30/2007Technology was late to come to the world of lawyers and law firms, long known for quill pens and steno pads. But now that it has arrived, it is spreading briskly.Modern-day law firms, especially megafirms with offices around the world, rely heavily o...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.