EU court rejects Akzo confidentiality complaint
Business Law
[##_1L|1072399082.jpg|width="130" height="132" alt=""|_##]The European Union's second highest court on Monday dismissed Akzo Nobel's complaint against the European Commission over seized documents the firm claimed were covered by lawyer-client confidentiality. The Commission raided the Dutch chemical group's offices in Manchester, Britain, in 2003 in a price-fixing investigation and took documents that Akzo said were protected by legal professional privilege.
The Court of First Instance of the European Communities ruled that the Commission had committed an infringement by forcing Akzo and subsidiary Akcros Chemicals to allow investigators a cursory look at documents and by not allowing them to contest the action.
However, it added: "The Court concludes that the infringements on the part of the Commission ... did not result in unlawfully depriving them of (lawyer-client) protection in respect of those documents, since, as has been held, the Commission did not err in deciding that none of those documents in fact fell within the scope of that protection."
The firms can appeal against legal points of the ruling.
A spokesman for Akzo said it would study the ruling and could not say whether it would appeal.
Related listings
-
CNET says SEC ends stock investigation
Business Law 09/05/2007CNET Networks said Tuesday that the Securities and Exchange Commission ended an inquiry into the company's stock option grants. Regulators won't take any action against San Francisco-based CNET, which is a media company. CNET's founder Shelby Bonnie ...
-
Law firm files investor lawsuit against Motorola
Business Law 09/02/2007Another law firm has filed an investor suit against Motorola Inc., claiming executives didn’t tell the market how bad things were last fall as sales began to slow. Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler LLP filed suit last Wednesday in U.S. District ...
-
Roche wins U.S. motion in Ventana bid battle
Business Law 08/23/2007[##_1L|1109364129.jpg|width="120" height="93" alt=""|_##]A U.S. court has granted Roche Holding AG's motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ventana Medical Systems Inc. from applying an Arizona anti-takeover law to defend itself against Roche...

Illinois Work Injury Lawyers – Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD.
Accidents in the workplace are often caused by unsafe work conditions arising from ignoring safety rules, overlooking maintenance or other negligence of those in management. While we are one of the largest firms in Illinois dedicated solely to the representation of injured workers, we pride ourselves on the personal, one-on-one approach we deliver to each client.
Work accidents can cause serious injuries and sometimes permanent damage. Some extremely serious work injuries can permanently hinder a person’s ability to get around and continue their daily duties. Factors that affect one’s quality of life such as place of work, relationships with friends and family, and social standing can all be taken away quickly by a work injury. Although, you may not be able to recover all of your losses, you may be entitled to compensation as a result of your work injury. Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD. provides informed advocacy in all kinds of workers’ compensation claims, including:
• Injuries to the back and neck, including severe spinal cord injuries
• Serious head injuries
• Heart problems resulting from workplace activities
• Injuries to the knees, elbows, shoulders and other joints
• Injuries caused by repetitive movements
For Illinois Workers’ Compensation claims, you will ALWAYS cheat yourself if you do not hire an experienced attorney. When you hire Krol, Bongiorno & Given, Ltd, you will have someone to guide you through the process, and when it is time to settle, we will add value to your case IN EXCESS of our fee. In the last few years, employers and insurance carriers have sought to advance the argument that when you settle a case without an attorney, your already low settlement should be further reduced by 20% so that you do not get a “windfall.” Representing yourself in Illinois is a lose-lose proposition.