Nokia says U.S. court case claims have no merit

Business Law

Nokia said on Monday it would defend itself vigorously against a class action complaint filed in the United States that claims the firm and its top executives hid some product delays from investors in 2008.

"Nokia has reviewed the allegations contained in the complaint and believes that they are without merit," the company said.

The City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System filed the case on Feb 5 against Nokia Corporation, chief executive Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo, then-chief financial officer Rick Simonson and Kai Oistamo, head of Nokia's phone business.

Related listings

  • Google Book Settlement Falls Short For Justice Dept.

    Google Book Settlement Falls Short For Justice Dept.

    Business Law 02/05/2010

    Google's latest effort to settle the copyright lawsuit brought against it by The Authors Guild and several publishers in 2005 suffered a setback on Thursday when the U.S. Department of Justice said that copyright and antitrust issues arising from the...

  • Ex-Lawyer: Toyota Willfully Deceptive

    Ex-Lawyer: Toyota Willfully Deceptive

    Business Law 02/04/2010

    Toyota's public relations nightmare appears far from over. The beleaguered automaker is facing renewed allegations that it systematically withheld information and ignored safety issues that could have prevented fatal accidents. Dmitrios Biller, a for...

  • SEC alleges fraud by Austin investment firm

    SEC alleges fraud by Austin investment firm

    Business Law 12/30/2009

    An Austin businessman and two of his companies are accused in an alleged scam using former NFL players to attract investors.The Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday filed securities fraud charges in federal court in Austin naming Kurt B. Bar...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read