Class Action Lawsuit Against Plexus Corp.

Class Action News

[##_1L|1138989249.jpg|width="120" height="138" alt=""|_##]Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased the common stock of Plexus Corp. ("Plexus" or the "Company") between January 25, 2006 and July 27, 2006, inclusive (the "Class Period"). The class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The Complaint alleges that defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing material misrepresentations to the market concerning the Company's business, operations and prospects, thereby artificially inflating the price of Plexus securities.

No class has yet been certified in the above action. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. If you purchased Plexus shares between January 25, 2006 and July 27, 2006, you have certain rights, and have until August 24, 2007, to move for Lead Plaintiff status. To be a member of the class you need not take any action at this time, and you may retain counsel of your choice.

If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Howard G. Smith, Esquire, of Law Offices of Howard G. Smith, 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020, by telephone at (215)638-4847, Toll-Free at (888)638-4847, by email to howardsmithlaw@hotmail.com or visit our website at http://www.howardsmithlaw.com.

Related listings

  • Parmalat must defend US investor class-action suit

    Parmalat must defend US investor class-action suit

    Class Action News 07/03/2007

    A Manhattan federal judge has rejected Parmalat SpA's (PLT.MI: Quote, Profile , Research) request to dismiss an investor class-action lawsuit stemming from the company's December 2003 collapse in an accounting scandal.The ruling is a defeat for the I...

  • Lawsuit over Scripps' billing of uninsured a class action

    Lawsuit over Scripps' billing of uninsured a class action

    Class Action News 06/29/2007

    [##_1L|1227943613.jpg|width="104" height="138" alt=""|_##]A San Diego Superior Court judge has granted class-action status to a lawsuit accusing Scripps Health hospitals of charging exorbitant amounts to uninsured patients who often aren't able to pa...

  • Class-action lawsuit against DIA dismissed

    Class-action lawsuit against DIA dismissed

    Class Action News 06/26/2007

    [##_1L|1258321551.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]Two former employees who claimed their illnesses were caused by mold and fungi exposure at Denver International Airport had their class-action claim dismissed by the Colorado Supreme Court. The...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read