Court Certifies UPS Class-Action Suit
Class Action News
[##_1L|1298395682.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]A California appeals court has reversed a decision blocking Mail Boxes Etc. franchisees from proceeding with a class-action lawsuit against UPS Inc., a group representing the franchisees said Friday. In a 21-page decision, the state appeals court ruled that the Los Angeles County Superior Court was wrong in denying a motion to certify a class action in the case.
Platinum Shield Association, a group that represents current and former franchisees seeking class-action status, alleges that the shipping company intentionally misled store owners into believing a new concept - The UPS (nyse: UPS - news - people ) Store - would be more profitable than their existing stores.
UPS acquired the Mail Boxes Etc. chain in 2001 and later renamed most of the stores as The UPS Store.
A copy of the decision was provided to The Associated Press by the group.
"This is a huge win for our organization," Howard Spanier, president of the association and a former franchisee, said in a statement. Spanier said franchisees were not given adequate information about the rebranding, which he said was "unavoidable and disastrous for many."
Franchisees involved in the suit are seeking damages and the chance to rescind their UPS Store contracts, the group said.
A call seeking comment from Atlanta-based UPS was directed to an attorney involved with the case. A voicemail message was not immediately returned.
Related listings
-
Class Action against LDK Solar Co., Inc.
Class Action News 10/15/2007[##_1L|1209255402.jpg|width="120" height="138" alt=""|_##]Murray, Frank & Sailer LLP has filed a class action in the Southern District of New York on behalf of shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired the securities of LDK Solar Co., Inc....
-
Supreme Court lets H-P/Compaq suit proceed
Class Action News 10/11/2007[##_1L|1363502209.jpg|width="104" height="138" alt=""|_##]A class-action lawsuit alleging Compaq Computer Corp. sold defective computers can proceed, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday. Compaq, which was founded in 1982 and bought by Palo Alto-b...
-
Shareholder Class Action Filed Against Opteum Inc.
Class Action News 10/10/2007The following statement was issued today by the law firm of Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP:Notice is hereby given that a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.