Court Certifies UPS Class-Action Suit
Class Action News
[##_1L|1298395682.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]A California appeals court has reversed a decision blocking Mail Boxes Etc. franchisees from proceeding with a class-action lawsuit against UPS Inc., a group representing the franchisees said Friday. In a 21-page decision, the state appeals court ruled that the Los Angeles County Superior Court was wrong in denying a motion to certify a class action in the case.
Platinum Shield Association, a group that represents current and former franchisees seeking class-action status, alleges that the shipping company intentionally misled store owners into believing a new concept - The UPS (nyse: UPS - news - people ) Store - would be more profitable than their existing stores.
UPS acquired the Mail Boxes Etc. chain in 2001 and later renamed most of the stores as The UPS Store.
A copy of the decision was provided to The Associated Press by the group.
"This is a huge win for our organization," Howard Spanier, president of the association and a former franchisee, said in a statement. Spanier said franchisees were not given adequate information about the rebranding, which he said was "unavoidable and disastrous for many."
Franchisees involved in the suit are seeking damages and the chance to rescind their UPS Store contracts, the group said.
A call seeking comment from Atlanta-based UPS was directed to an attorney involved with the case. A voicemail message was not immediately returned.
Related listings
-
Class Action against LDK Solar Co., Inc.
Class Action News 10/15/2007[##_1L|1209255402.jpg|width="120" height="138" alt=""|_##]Murray, Frank & Sailer LLP has filed a class action in the Southern District of New York on behalf of shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired the securities of LDK Solar Co., Inc....
-
Supreme Court lets H-P/Compaq suit proceed
Class Action News 10/11/2007[##_1L|1363502209.jpg|width="104" height="138" alt=""|_##]A class-action lawsuit alleging Compaq Computer Corp. sold defective computers can proceed, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday. Compaq, which was founded in 1982 and bought by Palo Alto-b...
-
Shareholder Class Action Filed Against Opteum Inc.
Class Action News 10/10/2007The following statement was issued today by the law firm of Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP:Notice is hereby given that a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.