GE attorney's class action lawsuit to go forward
Class Action News
A high-ranking attorney for General Electric Co. can go ahead with her class-action lawsuit against what she calls the "very male-dominated culture" in the international conglomerate, a federal judge has ruled.
U.S. District Judge Peter Dorsey on Wednesday rejected a motion filed by GE to prevent Lorene Schaefer's lawsuit from achieving class-action status. A class-action lawsuit would allow Schaefer to gather as many as 1,500 plaintiffs, including women who hold entry-level executive jobs and all the company's female lawyers. The lawsuit potentially seeks damages of $500 million.
Schaefer, general counsel of Erie, Pa.-based GE Transportation, filed a suit in May 2007 accusing officials of giving unfair preference to men in promotions to top-paying legal jobs.
Among its claims, GE argued that Schaefer cannot lead a class-action lawsuit because she had access to confidential client information while employed with GE.
Dorsey rejected that argument for now.
"If at any point during discovery, the defendants learn and can demonstrate that plaintiff is inappropriately using confidential client confidences in asserting her claims or representing the class, the court may reconsider the propriety of plaintiff's class allegations at that time," Dorsey wrote in his 30-page ruling.
In a statement, Schaefer said the ruling would benefit hundreds of GE employees.
Related listings
-
Centerline says class action lawsuit filed against co
Class Action News 01/23/2008Centerline Holding Co said class action lawsuit has been filed against it, its trustees and Related Cos, alleging claims related to Centerline's recently announced rights offering to an affiliate of Related Cos, according to a filing.The New York-bas...
-
De Beers Settles Class Action Suit
Class Action News 01/22/2008De Beers, the world's largest diamond importer, settled a class action lawsuit Monday worth $297 million, which would be divided roughly in half between consumers and diamond merchants and resellers.The lawsuit charged that De Beers and its subsidiar...
-
Lawyer Explains Xbox Class Action Suit
Class Action News 01/21/2008According to lawyer Jason Gibson, the class-action lawsuit filed against Microsoft as a result of Xbox Live's service problems isn't some kind of get-rich-quick scheme, it's an action meant to draw attention to a "serious issue." Gibson filed the sui...
Illinois Work Injury Lawyers – Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD.
Accidents in the workplace are often caused by unsafe work conditions arising from ignoring safety rules, overlooking maintenance or other negligence of those in management. While we are one of the largest firms in Illinois dedicated solely to the representation of injured workers, we pride ourselves on the personal, one-on-one approach we deliver to each client.
Work accidents can cause serious injuries and sometimes permanent damage. Some extremely serious work injuries can permanently hinder a person’s ability to get around and continue their daily duties. Factors that affect one’s quality of life such as place of work, relationships with friends and family, and social standing can all be taken away quickly by a work injury. Although, you may not be able to recover all of your losses, you may be entitled to compensation as a result of your work injury. Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD. provides informed advocacy in all kinds of workers’ compensation claims, including:
• Injuries to the back and neck, including severe spinal cord injuries
• Serious head injuries
• Heart problems resulting from workplace activities
• Injuries to the knees, elbows, shoulders and other joints
• Injuries caused by repetitive movements
For Illinois Workers’ Compensation claims, you will ALWAYS cheat yourself if you do not hire an experienced attorney. When you hire Krol, Bongiorno & Given, Ltd, you will have someone to guide you through the process, and when it is time to settle, we will add value to your case IN EXCESS of our fee. In the last few years, employers and insurance carriers have sought to advance the argument that when you settle a case without an attorney, your already low settlement should be further reduced by 20% so that you do not get a “windfall.” Representing yourself in Illinois is a lose-lose proposition.