Appeals court backs Chevron in Nigeria dispute
Court Alerts
A federal appeals court in San Francisco has upheld a jury verdict clearing the Chevron Corp. of alleged human rights abuses during a violent 1998 protest on a company oil platform in Nigeria.
The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Friday that the lower court judge conducted the 2008 trial that resulted in the verdict without error and instructed jurors properly.
Human rights activists had accused the Nigerian military of attacking protesters on orders from the oil company. The demonstration was over Chevron's alleged pollution of local fishing grounds and farms in the country's oil-rich Delta region.
Two demonstrators occupying the oil platform were killed. The company denied involvement.
Related listings
-
Appeals court ends tattoo parlor ban in Calif city
Court Alerts 09/10/2010A federal appeals court struck down a city ban on tattoo parlors Thursday, ruling the artistic expression is entitled to free speech protection under the U.S. Constitution.The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the Southern California city of ...
-
Garner Man Pleads Guilty To Transmitting Child Porn
Court Alerts 09/08/2010A Garner man has pleaded guilty Tuesday to transmitting child pornography over the internet.Gary Wayne Robinson, 28, entered the plea in federal court before Judge James C. Fox.Garner Police were alerted to Robinson after they say he engaged in an on...
-
Florida inmate loses appeal for victim's truck
Court Alerts 09/07/2010A Florida appellate court has ruled against a death row inmate who was convicted of killing a couple and then petitioned to keep a vintage pickup that belonged to one of the victims.The ruling may end a legal battle that has dragged on seven years af...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.