Appeals court sides with Redskins over trademark

Court Alerts

A federal appeals court is siding with the Washington Redskins against a group of American Indians who say the football team's trademark is racially offensive.


The decision issued Friday by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington doesn't address the main issue in the 17-year-old case of whether the trademark is racist. It upholds the lower court's decision in favor of the football team on a legal technicality.

The court agreed that the seven Native Americans who challenged the trademark waited too long to sue over the trademark issued in 1967.

Related listings

  • 3 plead not guilty in Anna Nicole Smith drug case

    3 plead not guilty in Anna Nicole Smith drug case

    Court Alerts 05/14/2009

    Anna Nicole Smith's lawyer-turned-boyfriend and two doctors pleaded not guilty Wednesday to charges they conspired to provide thousands of prescription pills to the former model before her overdose death two years ago. The appearance of Howard K. Ste...

  • Court hears appeal by DC sniper mastermind

    Court hears appeal by DC sniper mastermind

    Court Alerts 05/12/2009

    A lawyer for John Allen Muhammad says the sniper mastermind never should have been allowed to act as his own lawyer for part of his 2003 capital murder trial. Jonathan Sheldon told a federal appeals court Tuesday that the failure of Muhammad's trial ...

  • Judge Blasts Law Firm Over Asbestos Suit

    Judge Blasts Law Firm Over Asbestos Suit

    Court Alerts 05/08/2009

    A Los Angeles judge has blasted one of the nation's leading plaintiffs firms in asbestos litigation for attempting to obtain an upper hand in the case through what he called a "type of judicially sanctioned extortion." The judge's statements came in ...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read