California High Court Considers Marriage Challenge
Court Alerts
[##_1L|1147615251.jpg|width="104" height="138" alt=""|_##]The Supreme Court of California began receiving briefs Monday in a case that challenges a state law that defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Gay activists charge it "segregates them and their families from the rest of society," the Contra Costa Times reported. "This separation sends a powerful message," read a brief filed by the city of San Francisco, "one that reinforces in the public mind the already entrenched inferior status of lesbians and gay men. The message is easily understood: the state will recognize, but it will not honor, lesbian and gay family relationships."
Former Assemblyman Larry Bowler, a family advocate, said the court should defer to voters.
"At least four justices on that San Francisco bench are against the broad majority of California voters, who want marriage preserved and protected," he said. "The high court could deal a low blow to the voters by creating so-called 'same-sex marriages' in late 2007 or early 2008."
Liberty Counsel filed a brief representing Campaign for California Families. It challenged the assertion that protecting marriage is discriminatory.
"They aren't arguing for a minor change in marriage, but for a deconstruction of the entire institution of marriage," read a news release from the non-profit legal group. "The essence of marriage has always been the union of one man and one woman. We have never allowed any other human relationships to be united under the banner of marriage."
Related listings
-
Justices reject Guantánamo detainees' appeal
Court Alerts 04/02/2007[##_1L|1289600792.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]The Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday from Guantánamo detainees who want to challenge their five-year-long confinement in court, a victory for the Bush administration's legal strategy in ...
-
Court Revokes Citizenship of Former Nazi Policeman
Court Alerts 03/31/2007[##_1L|1050357155.jpg|width="100" height="89" alt=""|_##]A federal judge in Detroit has revoked the U.S. citizenship of John (Ivan) Kalymon of Troy, Mich., because he shot Jews in 1942 while serving in a Nazi-sponsored police unit that helped liquida...
-
Court takes strike option from Northwest attendants
Court Alerts 03/30/2007[##_1L|1122338836.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]Northwest Airlines Corp. flight attendants can't strike over pay cuts at the bankrupt carrier, a U.S. appeals court said, upholding a federal judge's ruling. "Although this is a complicated cas...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.