Canadian Law Firm Files Denture Cream Lawsuit
Court Alerts
A high-profile Canadian law firm has filed suit against the makers of PoliGrip and Fixodent, alleging that the companies failed to warn consumers sufficiently about the zinc contained in both products.
The suit, filed by Tony Merchant of Saskatchewan, is the latest consequence of a 2008 article in the magazine Neurology linking denture cream and serious nerve damage.
In a press release, Merchant acknowledged that the "companies have placed warnings and recognize the dangers." Still, Merchant says, those warnings failed to warn consumers adequately of the risks inherent in excessive zinc consumption.
PoliGrip manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has moved aggressively in the past year to address the zinc issue. Last October, the company began outfitting PoliGrip packages with warnings that excessive zinc intake can cause "serious health effects," and advised customers to talk with their doctors.
Proctor and Gamble, which makes Fixodent, provided similar warnings.
Related listings
-
Judge hears from alleged "sham" Green candidates
Court Alerts 09/14/2010Green Party nominees labeled "sham candidates" said in Arizona court that they are not running for office to siphon votes from Democrats.Christopher Campbell, Anthony Goshorn and Thomas Meadows testified Monday that Republicans planted the idea that ...
-
Court blasts Wisconsin judge for Hitler reference
Court Alerts 09/14/2010An appeals court has admonished a federal judge in Wisconsin for claiming a convicted drug dealer's love for his family is akin to Adolf Hitler's love for his dog.The U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago on Monday ordered that the defendant, ...
-
Philly news drivers last holdout to court sale
Court Alerts 09/13/2010The publisher of Philadelphia's two largest newspapers is pushing unionized drivers to agree to contract terms before Tuesday's bankruptcy sale deadline.Drivers who deliver The Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia Daily News are balking at plans to...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.