Court Approves Water Project Near Mexican Border
Court Alerts
[##_1L|1018303791.jpg|width="158" height="112" alt=""|_##]An appeals court has ruled that the federal government can line a major canal with concrete to stop huge leaks, rejecting arguments that growers across the border in Mexico need the leaking water for their crops.
Proponents of lining the All-American Canal say it would save 67,000 acre-feet of water, enough to meet the needs of more than 500,000 homes in fast-growing San Diego County.
Opponents, who sued to block the project, said it would devastate farmers in the Mexicali Valley.
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a law signed by President Bush last year that orders the Bureau of Reclamation to start the project without delay.
The court's ruling lifts an injunction granted last year when opponents sued.
Although more appeals are possible, the project's supporters said they hoped Friday's decision resolves the issue.
"This is truly a Good Friday," said Daniel S. Hentschke, a San Diego County Water Authority attorney. "This is enormously important for San Diego and the entire state."
The 82-mile-long canal was completed in 1942 to carry water west from the Colorado River. It irrigates crops along both sides of the border in an area about 100 miles east of San Diego.
Opponents of the $200 million project include both environmentalists and business representatives. They said lining a 23-mile section of the canal will dry up tens of thousands of acres of Mexican farmland, allow Mexican wells to become polluted and threaten migratory birds by eliminating wetlands. That could cause significant job losses and other economic problems on both sides of the border, they said.
The court said Mexico already takes 1.5 million acre-feet of Colorado River water a year under the terms of a 1944 treaty and is entitled to no more.
Related listings
-
Man Who Abused Puppy Sentenced to Jail
Court Alerts 04/07/2007A man has pleaded guilty to animal cruelty charges after authorities said he told workers at a local shelter that he was getting rid of his Doberman puppy because his hands hurt from hitting it. Isaak Gowhari, 34, of Los Angeles, was sentenced Thursd...
-
Man Pleads Guilty To Running Off With 13-Year-Old Girl
Court Alerts 04/07/2007[##_1L|1383177501.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]A 22-year-old man who ran off with his boss's 13-year-old daughter will be heading to federal prison. Eric Sanchez was arrested on a Greyhound bus in St. Louis last June when federal agents boa...
-
Executives plead guilty in prison-food bribery case
Court Alerts 04/07/2007[##_1L|1098035181.jpg|width="170" height="128" alt=""|_##]Two executives of a Los Angeles food company pleaded guilty in federal court Thursday to bribery charges arising from $532,000 in alleged kickbacks to Fred Monem, Oregon's recently fired priso...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.