Court backs Mo. death penalty procedure
Court Alerts
[##_1L|1409127290.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]A federal appeals court opened the way for Missouri to resume executing inmates, ruling Monday that the state's lethal injection procedure is not cruel and unusual punishment. The case filed on behalf of condemned killer Michael Taylor had effectively halted Missouri executions since early last year. A judge said he wanted to be sure that the three-drug injection method did not cause risk of pain and suffering.
A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found "no evidence to indicate that any of the last six inmates executed suffered any unnecessary pain," according to its ruling.
The court's decision reversed a ruling by U.S. District Judge Fernando Gaitan Jr. ordering reforms to Missouri's lethal injection procedures. He wanted the state to involve a doctor specializing in anesthesia, but the state has been unable to find a doctor willing to participate.
Missouri is among nine states that have put executions on hold as it grapples with whether lethal injection is inhumane.
Attorney General Jay Nixon said the decision "reopens the necessary legal avenue for the state of Missouri to move forward on this issue."
Margaret Phillips of the Eastern Missouri Coalition Against the Death Penalty said many questions remain unanswered and it would be unwise for the state to renew executions.
"The uncertainty of all of this is a good indication that Missouri needs a moratorium on the death penalty," she said.
A message seeking comment was left with the governor's office.
Taylor, convicted of killing 15-year-old Ann Harrison in Kansas City in 1989, was hours away from being put to death in February 2006 when the execution was halted. His attorney, Ginger Anders, said she would appeal Monday's ruling but declined further comment.
Related listings
-
High court restores killer's death sentence
Court Alerts 06/04/2007[##_1L|1336163544.jpg|width="130" height="97" alt=""|_##]Reversing the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in another murder case, the Supreme Court today restored a death sentence for a Washington state man who abducted, tortured and killed a young wo...
-
Arkansas court ends school-funding suit
Court Alerts 06/01/2007[##_1L|1066980411.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]State lawmakers are adequately funding public schools, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled Thursday in ending a long-running lawsuit. The court singled out the Legislature‘s continuing review of i...
-
NJ Court Certifies Wal-Mart Class-Action
Court Alerts 05/31/2007[##_1L|1386478295.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]The New Jersey Supreme Court on Thursday certified a class-action lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. by employees who claim that the nation's largest retailer denied them meal and rest breaks...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.