Court: Chase could increase interest rates
Court Alerts
The Supreme Court says a credit card company legally increased the interest rate on a man's card without telling him.
The high court on Monday ruled for Chase Bank USA and against James A. McCoy.
McCoy complained that Chase increased his interest rate due to his delinquency or default, and applied that increase retroactively. He says credit card regulations make that illegal because Chase did not notify him until after the increase went into effect.
The lower court had thrown out his lawsuit. Justice Sonia Sotomayor agreed, saying the Federal Reserve Board's interpretation of the regulations said Chase did not have to inform him of the rate increase.
Congress changed the law in 2009 to require credit card companies to give a 45-day notice before raising interest rates.
Related listings
-
Public interviews to be held with 60 applicants to Supreme Court
Court Alerts 01/20/2011A federal judge has rejected a challenge to Iowa's judicial nominating and retention system.U.S. District Court Judge Robert Pratt on Wednesday granted Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller's request to dismiss the lawsuit filed by four conservative activ...
-
2 lawyer brothers plead guilty in federal land fraud case
Court Alerts 01/19/2011Authorities say two Mississippi lawyers, who are also brothers, have pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering and bank fraud.U.S. Attorney John M. Dowdy says in a news release that 57-year-old Charles H. Evans Jr. and 53-year-old Jon C...
-
Court hears appeal from Anna Nicole Smith's estate
Court Alerts 01/18/2011The Supreme Court is preparing to hear arguments on whether Anna Nicole Smith's estate should get part of the fortune left behind by her elderly Texas billionaire husband.Lawyers for the deceased former Playmate plan to tell justices Tuesday her esta...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.