Court declines to postpone Internet radio royalty hike
Court Alerts
[##_1L|1404390948.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]A federal appeals court Wednesday rejected a plea by Internet broadcasters to prevent new royalties set to begin July 15, charges that Webcasters believe could silence them. The order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia noted Webcasters "have not satisfied the stringent standards required for a stay pending court review," according to News.com.
In a March ruling, the U.S. Copyright Royalty Board said Webcasters raised the current $.0012 fee Internet broadcasters must pay per stream to $.0008 for 2006, $.0011 for 2007, $.0014 for 2008, $.0018 for 2009 and $.0019 for 2010.
Jonathan Potter, executive director of the Digital Media Association, which represents large Internet radio stations including Yahoo, RealNetworks, Live365 and Pandora, said the court loss would force Webcasters "to make very difficult decisions about what music, if any, they are able to offer," according to the report.
Potter still holds out a possible compromise from SoundExchange, the organization collecting royalty fees. Two previous attempts, including capping the fees and freezing royalties at 1998 levels, failed.
Washington could also intervene and either set aside the Royalty Boar's ruling or cap total royalties at a percentage of their revenue.
Related listings
-
Court Puts Off Execution of Texas Hitman
Court Alerts 07/11/2007[##_1L|1340539306.jpg|width="120" height="101" alt=""|_##]A hitman paid $2,000 to gun down a San Antonio woman 15 years ago in a scheme devised by her husband and his brother to collect her life insurance benefits won a reprieve that blocked his sche...
-
Ex-partner at US law firm pleads guilty to conspiracy
Court Alerts 07/10/2007[##_1L|1328207169.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]A former partner of Milberg Weiss & Bershad, one of the first law firms in America to bring class actions against large companies, yesterday agreed to plead guilty to hiding payments made b...
-
Eau de Lawsuit: Woman Sues Over Scent
Court Alerts 07/07/2007[##_1L|1122921656.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]An employee in the Detroit planning department who claims she is severely sensitive to perfumes and other cosmetics has sued the city, saying a co-worker's strong fragrance prohibits her from w...
Illinois Work Injury Lawyers – Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD.
Accidents in the workplace are often caused by unsafe work conditions arising from ignoring safety rules, overlooking maintenance or other negligence of those in management. While we are one of the largest firms in Illinois dedicated solely to the representation of injured workers, we pride ourselves on the personal, one-on-one approach we deliver to each client.
Work accidents can cause serious injuries and sometimes permanent damage. Some extremely serious work injuries can permanently hinder a person’s ability to get around and continue their daily duties. Factors that affect one’s quality of life such as place of work, relationships with friends and family, and social standing can all be taken away quickly by a work injury. Although, you may not be able to recover all of your losses, you may be entitled to compensation as a result of your work injury. Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD. provides informed advocacy in all kinds of workers’ compensation claims, including:
• Injuries to the back and neck, including severe spinal cord injuries
• Serious head injuries
• Heart problems resulting from workplace activities
• Injuries to the knees, elbows, shoulders and other joints
• Injuries caused by repetitive movements
For Illinois Workers’ Compensation claims, you will ALWAYS cheat yourself if you do not hire an experienced attorney. When you hire Krol, Bongiorno & Given, Ltd, you will have someone to guide you through the process, and when it is time to settle, we will add value to your case IN EXCESS of our fee. In the last few years, employers and insurance carriers have sought to advance the argument that when you settle a case without an attorney, your already low settlement should be further reduced by 20% so that you do not get a “windfall.” Representing yourself in Illinois is a lose-lose proposition.