Court refuses appeal from reputed drug kingpin

Court Alerts

A reputed cocaine kingpin has lost his fight to reduce his 195-year prison term.


The Supreme Court, acting Monday, rejected an appeal from Salvador Magluta, who was convicted of laundering at least $730,000 in drug money and bribing a juror at an earlier trial. The federal appeals court in Atlanta threw out the bribery count, but otherwise upheld the lengthy sentence.

Magluta asked the high court to take his case to consider whether the government should have been barred from trying him again after a jury acquitted him in 1996 of charges based on the same conduct. He also disputed the sentence's length since the judge acknowledged he took into account money laundering charges on which the jury found Magluta not guilty.

Related listings

  • LA judge rules fraud in suits against Dole

    LA judge rules fraud in suits against Dole

    Court Alerts 04/24/2009

    A California judge on Thursday dismissed two lawsuits by purported Nicaraguan banana plantation workers against U.S. food giant Dole and other companies on grounds of fraud and attempted extortion. Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Victoria Cha...

  • 2 men sue priest who pleaded guilty to raping them

    2 men sue priest who pleaded guilty to raping them

    Court Alerts 04/22/2009

    Two upstate New York men have filed a $10 million lawsuit against a Catholic priest who pleaded guilty to raping them. The men say in court papers filed Monday in New York City that the Rev. Frank Genevive abused them between 1978 and 1987, when they...

  • Supermarket mogul guilty of bribery, racketeering, soliciting murder

    Supermarket mogul guilty of bribery, racketeering, soliciting murder

    Court Alerts 04/21/2009

    George Torres, a feisty entrepreneur who built a multimillion-dollar grocery store chain by catering to some of Los Angeles' poorest communities, was convicted of racketeering, solicitation of murder, bribery and other crimes Monday by a federal cour...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read