Court rules against 2 US citizens in Iraq
Court Alerts
The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against two U.S. citizens held in Baghdad who tried to use American courts to challenge their detention.
The unanimous decision came in the cases of Shawqi Omar, taken into custody in Iraq for allegedly assisting a terrorist network, and Mohammad Munaf, whose death sentence by an Iraqi court was recently overturned. Munaf has been accused in Iraq of setting up the 2005 kidnapping of three Romanian journalists.
Held by the U.S. military at Camp Cropper near Baghdad International Airport, both men are Sunni Muslims who say they will be tortured if turned over to the Iraqi government.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that U.S. courts are not allowed to intervene in an ongoing foreign criminal proceeding and "pass judgment on its legitimacy."
The justices ruled that basic protections do extend to American citizens held overseas by U.S. military operating as part of a multinational force. At the same time, however, the court said those protections provide Omar and Munaf with no legal relief.
The Bush administration argued that U.S. courts lack authority to review the claims of Munaf and Omar because they are held abroad by a multinational force, of which the United States is only a part.
Nations including Iraq have criminal jurisdiction over those within their borders, said the Justice Department solicitor general's office.
Arrested in 2004 by U.S. soldiers at his home in Baghdad, Omar was to have been transferred to Iraqi courts for trial, but a U.S. district court blocked the move.
In a case that is continuing, an Iraqi court recently reversed Munaf's death sentence.
Related listings
-
Justices rule against worker who lost job
Court Alerts 06/09/2008The Supreme Court says the Constitution's equal protection clause does not enable individual public employees to sue for workplace discrimination.In a 6-3 decision, the justices said that Anup Engquist must be a member of a class targeted for discrim...
-
Va. court upholds women's college move to coed
Court Alerts 06/06/2008A former all-women's college did not break a contract with female students when it decided to enroll men, a divided Virginia Supreme Court ruled Friday.In a 5-2 decision, the court rejected a claim by nine female students at Randolph College — former...
-
Court limits Vioxx monitoring payments by Merck
Court Alerts 06/05/2008Drugmaker Merck & Co. doesn't have to cover medical-monitoring expenses for Vioxx users who aren't claiming injury from the recalled painkiller, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled.Phyllis Sinclair and Joseph Murray sued Merck in 2004, seeking to ...
Victorville CA DUI defense Attorneys
The outcome of a DUI defense will have a long-term effect on anyone’s life, making the decision to receive legal representation an easy one. The fact is, most people accused of a DUI are first offenders with no criminal background. Whether this is your first run in with the law or you have had previous convictions, you are in need of a DUI defense attorney.
The charges you are facing for a DUI range from fines, a 12-month suspension on your license and worst-case scenario, prison time. Your attorney will be able to analyze your situation to decide the best way to go about your case.
Our attorneys know the tricky ways to challenge all of the DUI tests and know how to claim improper collection of evidence. We will be able to negotiate on your behalf and free you from charges and help you keep your drivers license. The DUI process can last up to several months, we can make this process easier on you. .