Court rules for NY Times in anthrax libel case
Court Alerts
A federal appeals court has ruled against a former Army scientist who sued The New York Times over columns linking him to deadly 2001 anthrax attacks.
A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Monday that Steven Hatfill was a public figure and had to prove actual malice to win his libel lawsuit. The court said Hatfill failed to meet that burden.
Five people were killed and 17 sickened in the anthrax attacks. Then-Attorney General John Ashcroft publicly identified Hatfill as a "person of interest" in the investigation.
Columnist Nicholas Kristof criticized the FBI's investigation as lackadaisical and initially referred to Hatfill as "Mr. Z." Kristof identified Hatfill by name only after Hatfill held a news conference to denounce rumors.
Related listings
-
Jocelyn Kirsch pleads guilty in ID theft case
Court Alerts 07/14/2008Jocelyn S. Kirsch, the former Drexel University student now a defendant in a bold identity-theft scam, pleaded guilty this morning in U.S. District Court to all charges in the case. Kirsch, 22, wearing no make up and wearing a wrinkled dark green pri...
-
Virginia's method of lethal injection upheld
Court Alerts 07/11/2008A federal appeals court on Thursday upheld Virginia's method of executing inmates by lethal injection, ruling that it prevents them from experiencing excruciating pain.In a 2-1 decision, a panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected conde...
-
Court keeps cell tower backup rules on hold
Court Alerts 07/09/2008More than a year after they were introduced, federal rules intended to keep cell phone towers operating during natural disasters remain in limbo.A federal appeals court on Tuesday put off deciding on the wireless industry's challenge to the regulatio...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.