Court won't review Lake Conroe capital case

Court Alerts

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to review the case of a Montgomery County man condemned for shooting a woman and dumping her body in a lake so he could steal her red convertible.

Michael James “Romeo” Perry was convicted of the slaying of 50-year-old Sandra Stotler during a burglary of her home near Lake Conroe eight years ago.

The 27-year-old Perry also was a suspect but never was charged in the slayings of Stotler’s 16-year-old son, Adam, and an 18-year-old friend, Jeremy Richardson.

Perry was driving Adam Stotler’s SUV when he was arrested following a police shootout and says a confession he made to police is untrue.

He does not have an execution date.

Related listings

  • Gambler lawsuit heads to the Supreme Court

    Gambler lawsuit heads to the Supreme Court

    Court Alerts 11/09/2009

    Should a casino be held responsible for a compulsive gambler who lost $135,000 in a single night?It's now up to the Indiana Supreme Court.Jenny Kephart says Ceasars Indiana enticed her to gamble with free meals, rooms and money on credit.The casino s...

  • Mich. man wins appeal to get name off sex registry

    Mich. man wins appeal to get name off sex registry

    Court Alerts 11/05/2009

    The Michigan Court of Appeals says a man who had a teenage romance with a girl he later married doesn't deserve to be on the state's sex offender list.Robert Dipiazza had a consensual relationship when he was 18 with a nearly 15-year-old in 2004. A t...

  • DC sniper asks Supreme Court to block execution

    DC sniper asks Supreme Court to block execution

    Court Alerts 11/04/2009

    Attorneys for John Allen Muhammad, mastermind of the 2002 sniper attacks in the Washington, D.C., area that left 10 dead, asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday to stop his execution.The 48-year-old Muhammad is scheduled to die by injection on Nov. ...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read