Ex-Trooper Pleads Guilty In Shooting Death
Court Alerts
[##_1L|1275081875.jpg|width="120" height="101" alt=""|_##]A former state trooper pleaded guilty Thursday to negligent homicide in the March 2006 shooting death of a disabled man whom police mistook for a prison escapee. "I mistook this young man's actions as threatening toward me and the other officers and I made the mistake of acting on this misunderstanding, sir," former trooper Larry Norman told Circuit Judge Tom Keith as more than a dozen of his former comrades looked on at a hearing in Benton County Circuit Court.
Keith set a sentencing hearing for June 28 and ordered a pre-sentence investigation. Norman faces up to a year in jail, a $1,000 fine and possibly other sanctions, including community service.
A grand jury indicted Norman in April 2006 in the shooting death Erin Hamley, 21.
The grand jury's findings detailed Norman's action when responding to the scene on U.S. 412 west of Tontitown, where police had Hamley surrounded, mistakenly thinking he was prison escapee Adam Leadford.
Norman disregarded his orders, played the radio in his police cruiser too loud to hear dispatches and did not communicate with other officers before fatally shooting Hamley, according to the grand jury's report.
Several of Hamley's family members, including his mother, attended Thursday's hearing but declined comment afterward.
"They were satisfied with the fact that Norman stood up and admitted guilt, and for the judge to determine the sentence," Prosecutor Van Stone said. "Both sides felt it would be best to let Judge Keith make the determination."
Norman waived his right to a jury trial in his plea and also waived right to appeal.
"The family didn't want to have to go through a trial," the prosecutor said. "It's a good way to resolve this particular case, given all the circumstances."
The Legislature approved a $1 million payment to Erin Hamley's estate because of the death. State police did not admit wrongdoing.
The agency granted Norman medical retirement last year because of what his attorney called an "enormous psychological overlay" from the shooting.
Norman had been on the scene less than one minute before shooting Hamley, who was lying on his back when shot. The grand jury's report stated Hamley may have been trying to turn on his stomach, as Norman ordered, instead of reaching in his pockets, as Norman said he suspected.
The slug Norman fired hit the pavement first, grazed Hamley's arm, then entered his body.
Some of the incident was captured on film by cameras mounted on police vehicles. The film will be made public after the sentencing hearing, Stone said.
Other evidence will be opened to the public the same day, including hours of interviews conducted by the grand jury with Norman and other officers on the scene.
Related listings
-
Man pleads guilty in slaying of gay teen
Court Alerts 05/01/2007[##_1L|1174096118.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]One of three defendants accused of killing a teenager because he was gay has pleaded guilty to capital murder, prosecutors said. As required by state law, jurors will still hear testimony in an...
-
Ex-Spartan pleads not guilty in neighbor's slaying
Court Alerts 05/01/2007[##_1L|1378096054.jpg|width="130" height="94" alt=""|_##]A judge ordered a mental health examination for a former Michigan State football player who pleaded not guilty on Monday to tossing a neighbor to his death from a third-floor apartment balcony....
-
Man pleads guilty in siblings' deaths
Court Alerts 05/01/2007A 19-year-old man took responsibility Monday for being intoxicated and causing a Dec. 30, 2006, wreck that killed three siblings. Jurors will return to the 347th District Court on Wednesday to decide the punishment of Scott Ryan Helgerson, who pleade...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.