High-Speed Chase Reaches Supreme Court
Court Alerts
The Supreme Court finds itself smack in the middle of a big debate over high-speed chases.
Officers in Georgia were chasing a speeding Victor Harris in 2001 when a cruiser rammed Harris' Cadillac at roughly 90 miles-per-hour, sending him into an embankment and leaving him paralyzed.
Harris sued Deputy Timothy Scott for violating his civil rights by using excessive force. Scott said he was trying to end the chase before anybody got hurt. Two lower courts sided with Harris.
This will be the first time in more than 20 years that the high court considers constitutional limits on police use of deadly force to stop fleeing suspects.
Harris' lawyer argues something more serious than a traffic violation has to occur before such force is used. Scott's attorney counters he didn't use excessive force, and that Harris was driving recklessly.
Related listings
-
California Top court to decide police chase liability
Court Alerts 02/25/2007The Supreme Court hears arguments this week in a case that will test the limits of what officers can do to stop speeding drivers in high-speed chases. At issue before the court is whether a Georgia police officer went too far when he rammed his vehic...
-
Second Ohio Man Sentenced for Hate Crimes
Court Alerts 02/23/2007[##_1L|1031454617.jpg|width="120" height="107" alt=""|_##]Joseph Kuzlik, of Cleveland, Ohio, was sentenced today to 27 months in federal prison and three years of supervised release for committing a racially motivated crime which violated the federal...
-
Crown requests jail time for 75-year-old fraudster
Court Alerts 02/21/2007A prosecutor wants federal prison time for a 75-year-old former lawyer who bilked his elderly clients of millions of dollars.Gordon McGilton's spotless reputation as a volunteer, church member and veteran lawyer specializing in wills was exactly why ...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.