Judge Says Couey Eligible For Death Penalty
Court Alerts
[##_1L|1150945122.jpg|width="180" height="135" alt=""|_##]Circuit Judge Richard Howard ruled Tuesday that John Couey is not mentally retarded. That means Couey, 48, is eligible for the death penalty. Defense attorneys argued Couey cannot face execution because he is retarded. Howard sifted through a great deal of evidence and testimony on the issue of Couey's mental status and ultimately relied on what he called the most credible intelligence test: one administered by prosecution expert Gregory Pritchard, a clinical psychologist.
Couey scored 78. The legal cutoff point is 70.
"The judge's ruling is consistent with the position that I took. He [Couey] is not retarded, and he's not retarded beyond a reasonable doubt," Chief Assistant State Attorney Ric Ridgway said Tuesday night. The prosecutor had read the judge's ruling earlier in the evening.
Couey was convicted in March of burglary, kidnapping, sexual battery and murder in the 2005 death of Jessica, a 9-year-old third-grader from Homosassa. The same Miami jury recommended, in a 10-2 vote, that the convicted sex offender be sentenced to death.
The judge's ruling means a possible death sentence is looming. Howard is not obliged to follow the jury's recommendation, but is required to give it "great weight."
Ridgway declined to predict the sentence. A hearing is scheduled for Aug. 24.
"It would not be appropriate to say this foreshadows what the judge's ruling will be," Ridgway said.
To have proven Couey was retarded, defense attorneys had to show that his IQ was less than 70, that he lacks adaptive functioning and that the retardation existed before he was 18. A 2002 Supreme Court ruling forbids the execution of the mentally retarded.
Members of the Lunsford family could not be reached Tuesday for comment.
Related listings
-
Court Seizes OJ Simpson's All-Pro Football Earnings
Court Alerts 08/08/2007[##_1L|1348477735.jpg|width="130" height="132" alt=""|_##]Relatives of murder victim Ron Goldman won a court order on Tuesday seizing any money O.J. Simpson earns for lending his name and likeness to a football video game with a fictional team called...
-
Woman Pleads Guilty To Passing Bad Checks
Court Alerts 08/06/2007[##_1L|1365070302.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]An employee of a physician-billing service pleaded guilty in federal court to charges of passing about $100,000 in forged checks. Christine Ann Wilson, of Beechview, deposited checks issued by ...
-
Guilty Plea Entered in Falwell Bomb Case
Court Alerts 08/04/2007[##_1L|1018255796.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]A Liberty University student who pleaded not guilty last month to charges of possessing a bomb the night before the Rev. Jerry Falwell's funeral changed his plea in federal court. Mark David Uh...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.