NY Man Guilty in Death of White Teen
Criminal Law
A jury on Saturday convicted a black man of killing a white teenager during a racially charged encounter outside the man's home.
Jurors found John White, 54, guilty of second-degree manslaughter in the death of Daniel Cicciaro despite the man's claims that he feared a "lynch mob" had come to attack his family.
The ruling came on the fourth day of deliberations following an emotional three-week trial in which defense attorneys invoked the nation's violent racist past in arguing the shooting was justified.
Jurors also found White guilty of criminal possession of a weapon.
White testified during the trial that he was trying to protect his family in 2006 when he brandished a gun after a group of angry white teenagers turned up at his house late at night to fight his son.
White claimed the gun went off accidentally, killing Cicciaro, 17.
Jurors had asked on Saturday to hear readbacks of testimony from White's wife and son.
Related listings
-
Boys’ Kidnapper Gets 170 Years More
Criminal Law 12/22/2007Michael Devlin received one final sentence Friday — 170 years — for making pornography of a boy he kidnapped and sexually assaulted over four years.Devlin is already serving multiple life terms for kidnapping and assaulting Shawn Hornbeck and another...
-
ND Jailer Pleads Guilty to Sex Assaults
Criminal Law 12/16/2007former jailer convicted last month of killing a college student pleaded guilty Friday to sexually assaulting female inmates last year at the jail where he worked.Moe Gibbs, 35, pleaded guilty to six felony counts involving five inmates at the B...
-
NY Man Found Guilty of Murdering Family
Criminal Law 12/05/2007One of two men accused of killing a family of five over drugs and setting their house on fire was found guilty Tuesday.Prosecutors accused Mark Serrano, 30, and Charles Gilleo Jr., 32, of killing Tina and Manuel "Tony" Morey and their three young son...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.