Supreme Court may Decide Contamination Case
Environmental
A high-stakes legal battle over a century of smelter contamination dumped into the Columbia River by a Canadian mining and smelting giant may be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The court issued an order today inviting the U.S. Solicitor General – the lead lawyer for the Bush administration – to file an amicus brief on behalf of one or more of the parties in the complex case, filed in 2004 against Teck Cominco Ltd. by two leaders of the Colville Confederated Tribes.
The high court’s order doesn’t necessarily mean the justices have agreed to accept the case, said Mary Sue Wilson, a senior assistant attorney general for Washington state in Olympia.
“We don’t think it’s a signal either way. It’s not unusual for the court to ask, what does the U.S. government have to say?,” Wilson said.
The litigation was brought by Joe Pakootas and D.R. Michel under the “citizen’s suit” provisions of Superfund in an effort to force Teck Cominco to pay for an environmental cleanup of Lake Roosevelt.
Teck Cominco, based in Vancouver, B.C., claims it would only be subject to Superfund, the U.S. law governing toxic waste cleanups, if it had “arranged” for the waste to end up in the United States.
Last July, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rebuffed that argument and ruled that Teck Cominco is subject to U.S. toxic waste cleanup laws. That ruling was hailed by Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire, who called it “good news for all Washingtonians.”
On Oct. 30, the court reiterated its position after lawyers for Teck Cominco unsuccessfully petitioned for a rehearing. Teck Cominco filed an immediate appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
For months, the court has been silent on whether it would accept or reject the case, which legal experts have called a unique use of Superfund’s “citizen’s suit” provision in an effort to compel a foreign company to clean up under strict U.S. cleanup laws.
Additional briefing in the case could take two to six months, Wilson said.
Related listings
-
US opens to global emissions-cutting goal
Environmental 05/31/2007[##_1L|1207075775.jpg|width="140" height="135" alt=""|_##]The United States will work with other nations in seeking a global goal for cutting greenhouse-gas emissions, President George W Bush said Thursday. Bush, in a speech looking ahead to next mon...
-
Schwarzenegger's deals distract from global warming
Environmental 05/29/2007[##_1L|1364031784.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]Since he made California the first state to limit greenhouse gases, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has been signing agreements with other state and foreign governments to address global warming. He...
-
Scientists criticize UN climate report for being too soft
Environmental 04/07/2007[##_1L|1338168269.jpg|width="100" height="125" alt=""|_##]Scientists criticized the UN global warming report for being too soft as a result of pressure by some governments, it was reported on Saturday. The study findings were watered down at the last...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.