Oscar Mayer employees seek pay for equipment time
Labor & Employment
Employees at the Oscar Mayer meat processing plant in Davenport, Iowa have filed a class action lawsuit seeking compensation for time they spend putting on and taking off their safety equipment.
The lawsuit claims employees are not paid while they don and doff uniforms, safety footwear, hairnets, glasses and other equipment before and after their shifts in violation of the law.
Four current employees are the plaintiffs in the case. Their attorneys are seeking to represent a class of 1,750 employees at the plant, which processes pork, beef and poultry.
The lawsuit names Oscar Mayer's parent company, Northfield, Ill.-based Kraft Foods Inc.
Kraft spokeswoman Rachel Larsen says the company believes it is in full compliance with state and federal law.
Related listings
-
Jobless rate rises to 9.8 pct. as job growth slows
Labor & Employment 12/03/2010The nation's unemployment rate climbed to 9.8 percent in November, a seven-month high, as hiring slowed.Employers added only 39,000 jobs last month, a sharp decline from the 172,000 created in October, the Labor Department reported Friday. The weakne...
-
Class of Undocumented Workers Sues Wal-Mart
Labor & Employment 10/18/2010In a federal class action, 42 named plaintiffs say Wal-Mart hired them knowing they were undocumented, stiffed them for overtime and for regular wages, paid them in cash or by personal checks from labor contractors, put them to forced labor through c...
-
California minimum wage fight heads back to court
Labor & Employment 07/09/2010Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's administration has filed a new lawsuit to force the state controller to pay California government workers the federal minimum wage.The Department of Personnel Administration filed the lawsuit Tuesday against Controller Jo...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.