South African Law Firms Merge to be Biggest
Law Firm News
COMMERCIAL law firms Webber Wentzel Bowens and Mallinicks yesterday announced plans to merge in a move that would make the new entity one of SA’s biggest law firms, and rival corporate law advisers Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs.
The new firm, which will be led by Webber Wentzel Bowens senior partner David Lancaster, will have 300 lawyers.
The Ernst & Young Mergers & Acquisitions Review for 2006, which ranks legal advisers on the value of transactions they advised on, ranked Webber Wentzel Bowens as second last year with 29 deals worth R52bn, followed by Edward Nathan with 35 deals worth R46,75bn. Mallinicks was ranked 36th with three deals worth R178m.
Combined, the firms could be a large player in the market and their merger is part of the recent trend which has seen consolidation in the legal services sector.
The merger follows that of Edward Nathan’s recent blockbuster merger with Cape Town based-law firm Sonnenberg Hoffmann Galombik. Prior to that, Cliffe Dekker entered into an alliance with the world’s second-biggest law firm , DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary.
Law experts say that the South African legal profession is a marketplace that is undergoing dramatic change. Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs chairman Michael Katz said mergers for large law firms “make good commercial sense. Nowadays law firms require scale.” Law firms must either scale up or become niche practices, he said. “Somewhere in between is problematic.”
However, Werksmans chairman Des Williams said relationships were more important at this stage than size for South African law firms to be world class.
Webber Wentzel Bowens had been looking for a merger partner for some time. “We have been focused on growth for some time now and we believe the new firm will allow us to enhance our delivery service to clients by capitalising on the enhanced quality, scale and scope of the merged firm to the advantage of our clients and staff,” Lancaster said.
The combined firm would start operating from March 1 next year . The merger would take effect when regulatory approvals were granted.
Mallinicks chairman Michael Evans said: “Webber Wentzel Bowens is the major force in corporate law in SA and merging with them will undoubtedly result in a strong, strategic and regional fit as a large part of our business is in corporate law too.”
“We will run the new merged entity as one firm. The new name and branding will underscore this fact,” Lancaster said.
Evans said both firms were committed to transformation. Between them they would have more than 100 black lawyers, of which 30 would be partners.
Related listings
-
Gibson Dunn Promotes 14 Lawyers to Partner
Law Firm News 11/13/2007Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP is pleased to announce that the Firm has elected 14 new partners, effective January 1, 2008. The new partners represent a wide range of practice areas and geographical regions. "We are proud to recognize the acco...
-
Tully law firm adds office in D.C.
Law Firm News 11/08/2007An Albany law firm will be adding offices in Washington, D.C. early next year, buoyed by a recent contract with the largest union of federal employees in the country. Tully Rinckey & Associates PLLC plans to open a Washington office with three at...
-
Helms Mulliss & Wicker Receives Top Ranking
Law Firm News 10/30/2007[##_1L|1082784786.png|width="258" height="66" alt=""|_##]Helms Mulliss Wicker, PLLC, (HMW) announced today that it won the top ranking, “Highly Recommended,” in the debut issue of Benchmark: Litigation, The Definitive Guide to America’s Leading Litig...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.