Appeals court to consider slur in Jayson Williams case

Lawyer Blogs

The manslaughter case against former New Jersey Nets star Jayson Williams returns to court.

Attorneys for Williams are scheduled to argue in front of a three-judge panel on Wednesday that prosecutors must divulge all details about a racial slur used by an investigator in the case.

The dispute over the slur postponed Williams' retrial for reckless manslaughter, which was to have begun in January.

The 40-year-old Williams was convicted in 2004 of trying to cover up the shooting death of hired driver Costas Christofi two years earlier. The jury acquitted him of aggravated manslaughter but deadlocked on the reckless manslaughter count. Williams has been free on bail since the shooting.

Related listings

  • Court lets prosecutor remain on 'Alpha Dog' case

    Court lets prosecutor remain on 'Alpha Dog' case

    Lawyer Blogs 05/13/2008

    California's highest court ruled that a prosecutor who helped in the making of "Alpha Dog" may remain on the death penalty case on which the film is based.In a similar ruling Monday, the court also reinstated a prosecutor who was taken off a rape cas...

  • Court won't block US lawsuit by apartheid victims

    Court won't block US lawsuit by apartheid victims

    Lawyer Blogs 05/12/2008

    The Supreme Court said Monday that it can't intervene in an important dispute over the rights of apartheid victims to sue U.S. corporations in U.S. courts because four of the nine justices had to sit out the case over apparent conflicts.The result is...

  • Invoking history, Bush wants court out of subpoena fight

    Invoking history, Bush wants court out of subpoena fight

    Lawyer Blogs 05/10/2008

    If there's one thing Congress and the Bush administration can agree on, it's that they've got a fight of historic proportions on their hands.The House Judiciary Committee is demanding documents and testimony from President Bush's closest advisers abo...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read