Appeals court upholds $15M award to LAPD officers
Lawyer Blogs
A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a $15 million award to three officers who accused the Los Angeles Police Department of wrongly arresting them and making them scapegoats during the notorious Rampart scandal.
The massive corruption scandal led to the investigation of 82 incidents involving 50 officers and reversal of more than 100 convictions tainted by police misconduct.
A jury in 2006 determined that the three men were each entitled to $5 million because they were wrongly arrested and charged with filing false police reports.
The three were implicated by former officer Rafael Perez, the central figure of the scandal in which officers were alleged to have beaten, robbed, framed and shot innocent people in the city's tough Rampart neighborhood. Dozens of officers were investigated, leading to some resignations and internal discipline, but only a small number of prosecutions.
Perez told investigators that the three men — Paul Harper, Edward Ortiz and Brian Liddy — had lied about finding a gun on a gang suspect during a 1996 arrest.
Harper and Ortiz are still with the department, but Liddy has left, according Officer Karen Smith, a LAPD spokeswoman.
The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in its decision Monday noted that on three different occasions Perez gave investigators significantly divergent accounts of what allegedly happened during the arrest, including the inaccurate detail that a music sound system had to be dismantled at the arrest scene.
A state court jury did convict the three men in 2000 of conspiracy to obstruct justice in the framing of two reputed gang members. A Superior Court judge threw out the convictions a month later, citing faulty jury instructions.
Prosecutors decided not to pursue the case, and a judge dismissed the charges in 2004.
Related listings
-
Ohio plans first execution since moratorium
Lawyer Blogs 07/11/2008Ohio is planning its first execution since a U.S. Supreme Court decision ended a national pause on killing inmates.The Ohio Supreme Court on Friday set an execution date of Oct. 14 for Richard Cooey, who was convicted of raping and murdering two Univ...
-
US war crimes court to resume at Guantanamo
Lawyer Blogs 07/09/2008U.S. military tribunals at Guantanamo Bay resume this week even as new legal challenges could throw the system into further turmoil.Five men charged in the Sept. 11 attacks, including alleged mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, are to appear Wednesday...
-
R.I. lead paint loss gives industry huge win
Lawyer Blogs 07/07/2008Communities and child health advocates around the country had pinned their hopes on Rhode Island prevailing in its landmark lawsuit against the lead paint industry.Now, after the state Supreme Court threw out the first-ever jury verdict finding forme...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.