Court says FirstEnergy cost deferrals problematic
Lawyer Blogs
[##_1L|1295780485.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]An Ohio court has ruled that state regulators violated the law by allowing FirstEnergy Corp to raise future distribution rates to offset more than $150 million of fuel costs, the company said on Thursday. In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, FirstEnergy said the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) violated certain provisions of the Ohio Revised Code because fuel costs are a component of generation service, not distribution service.
In January 2006, PUCO approved the recovery of some of FirstEnergy's fuel costs through a fuel rider and allowed them to recover other fuel costs over a 25-year period beginning Jan. 2009 through distribution rates.
The court also found that said it did not believe PUCO addressed whether the deferral of recovery was anticompetitive. It sent the issue back to the commission for further consideration.
FirstEnergy said it plans to contest the court's interpretation and ask it to reconsider the ruling. It also intends to file a concurrent application with the PUCO, laying out a new plan for recovery of the fuel costs.
It said it would continue deferring the fuel costs until the court hears its motion to reconsider the case.
Related listings
-
Ex-Goldman Sachs Worker Pleads Guilty
Lawyer Blogs 08/29/2007[##_1L|1110583309.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]A former Goldman Sachs analyst pleaded guilty Tuesday to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and insider trading, admitting he participated in a scheme that helped earn more than $6.7 million...
-
Storm builds around Idaho senator's arrest
Lawyer Blogs 08/29/2007[##_1L|1073231473.jpg|width="120" height="93" alt=""|_##]Idaho Sen. Larry Craig isn't sticking to the script about how sex scandals play out in the nation's capital. In fact, he's following it backward. The rich history of powerful figures accused of...
-
Senator Pleads Guilty After Arrest at Airport
Lawyer Blogs 08/28/2007[##_1L|1179310138.jpg|width="120" height="101" alt=""|_##]Senator Larry E. Craig, Republican of Idaho, pleaded guilty to a disorderly conduct charge earlier this month after his arrest in June by an undercover police officer in a men's bathroom at th...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.