Court says gunmaker can't be sued over LA rampage

Lawyer Blogs

An appeals court has rejected a lawsuit against a gunmaker over a 1999 shooting rampage at a San Fernando Valley Jewish center.

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Los Angeles ruled Monday that a federal law shielding gunmakers from suits over criminal use of their products was constitutional.

White supremacist Buford Furrow wounded five people, including three children, at a Jewish community center in Granada Hills. He later killed a postal carrier.

Furrow pleaded guilty and got life in prison.

Relatives of victims sued Georgia-based Glock Inc., RSR Wholesale Guns Seattle and a Chinese manufacturer. Monday's ruling said Glock and the Seattle dealer were immune. The case against China North Industries Corp. can proceed.

Related listings

  • Demjanjuk offers no clues to possible surrender

    Demjanjuk offers no clues to possible surrender

    Lawyer Blogs 05/10/2009

    Possibly days away from his deportation to Germany, suspected Nazi guard John Demjanjuk and his family are offering no clues about the 89-year-old's response to a government notice asking that he surrender to U.S. immigration authorities. All appeare...

  • Ex-Top Democratic Donor Pleads Guilty To Fraud

    Ex-Top Democratic Donor Pleads Guilty To Fraud

    Lawyer Blogs 05/09/2009

    Norman Hsu, a former top fund-raiser for the Democratic Party, pleaded guilty Thursday to running a fraudulent investment scheme but he continues to fight charges of making fraudulent political contributions. Hsu, 58 years old, pleaded guilty to five...

  • Ex-Top Democratic Donor Pleads Guilty To Fraud

    Ex-Top Democratic Donor Pleads Guilty To Fraud

    Lawyer Blogs 05/08/2009

    Norman Hsu, a former top fund-raiser for the Democratic Party, pleaded guilty Thursday to running a fraudulent investment scheme but he continues to fight charges of making fraudulent political contributions. Hsu, 58 years old, pleaded guilty to five...

Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?

IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.

Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.

Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read