Federal court in Ohio says upholds e-mails privacy
Lawyer Blogs
An attorney sees a court's opinion upholding e-mail privacy as potentially groundbreaking and possibly helpful to his client, the founder of a company that sold male enhancement pills.
Lawyer Martin Weinberg said Wednesday that e-mail evidence should have been excluded from the government's case against Steven Warshak, who was convicted of fraud and other crimes related to his Ohio company. It sold products including Enzyte pills, known for their "Smiling Bob" commercials.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati threw out Warshak's 25-year sentence Tuesday. The court also said Warshak's rights were violated when investigators obtained his e-mails without warrants, but it upheld his convictions.
Related listings
-
Fla sued over sale of driver's license information
Lawyer Blogs 12/14/2010A federal judge has ruled that a class-action lawsuit can be filed against Florida over the sale of personal driver's license information to a private firm.The lawsuit claims the state, specifically the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles...
-
Court won't get involved in NY lawyer ad fight
Lawyer Blogs 12/13/2010The Supreme Court will not get involved in a New York dispute over whether officials can curb some law firm television commercials. The high court refused to hear an appeal from New York officials who passed rules that would curb some television comm...
-
Indians question Colo. firm's motives in vote case
Lawyer Blogs 12/13/2010The Mountain States Legal Foundation has built a reputation as an influential behind-the-scenes player over the years on conservative legal causes.It has waged battles against affirmative action and protections for endangered species while being bank...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.