'Lingerer' Asks NYC Court to Drop Case
Lawyer Blogs
[##_1L|1007959721.jpg|width="130" height="130" alt=""|_##]Standing around to chat on a busy Manhattan street can certainly create an inconvenience for other pedestrians. But is it illegal? A man arrested after a confab with friends in Times Square has asked the state's highest court to dismiss the case. The Court of Appeals heard arguments in Albany Wednesday and could rule next month. Matthew Jones was charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest — by flailing his arms — on June 12, 2004. Police said other people "had to walk around" him, and he wouldn't move when asked.
The Brooklyn man pleaded guilty to a violation after spending a night in jail, but he later appealed. Courts have upheld his arrest so far.
His lawyer, Nancy E. Little, said Wednesday there was no legal justification for arresting Jones for simply standing on the street.
"You need something more," she said. "You need to be being verbally abusive, or really blocking lots of people, or lying down on the sidewalk."
But assistant Manhattan district attorney Paula Rose-Stark said the disorderly conduct arrest was warranted, noting that Jones' behavior stood out "amid the inevitable hustle and bustle of Times Square."
Prosecutors' arguments drew several questions Wednesday from judges — including Chief Judge Judith Kaye, who wondered aloud how bustling Times Square was when Jones was arrested around 2 a.m.
Related listings
-
Court Review Slows Number of Executions
Lawyer Blogs 10/18/2007[##_1L|1213042615.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]The Supreme Court's decision to review the constitutionality of lethal injection procedures has slowed the annual number of executions to the lowest level in a decade amid renewed concerns abou...
-
Supreme Court Pursues Microsoft, Best Buy Case
Lawyer Blogs 10/17/2007[##_1L|1382086187.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]The Supreme Court Monday rejected an appeal in the racketeering case against Microsoft and Best Buy that alleges consumers had MSN accounts activated and were charged for them without their kno...
-
House Democrats split on Armenian 'genocide' bill
Lawyer Blogs 10/17/2007[##_1L|1367073907.jpg|width="140" height="135" alt=""|_##]A House vote on whether to label as genocide the killings of 1.5 million Armenians by what is now Turkey -- a resolution that deeply offended that key U.S. ally -- could be delayed as Democrat...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.