Refco Ex-CEO Pleads Guilty to 20 Counts
Lawyer Blogs
Refco's former chairman and chief executive, Phillip R. Bennett, pleaded guilty to fraud, conspiracy and money laundering, among other charges, in a scheme that cost investors at least $2.4 billion.
Bennett's plea yesterday came a month before he was scheduled to go on trial in New York on charges of deceiving banks, auditors and investors, including the buyout firm Thomas H. Lee Partners, during an eight-year accounting fraud.
Two colleagues, former Refco finance chief Robert C. Trosten and former president Tone Grant, still face a March 17 trial.
Under federal sentencing guidelines, Bennett faces life imprisonment with a maximum penalty of 315 years covering all 20 counts as well as forfeiture of $2.4 billion, prosecutors said.
Bennett, whose lawyer said he has $20 million in assets, is scheduled to be sentenced May 20.
After increasing bail, the judge rejected a request by prosecutors to take Bennett into custody immediately.
"I take full responsibility for my conduct," Bennett, 59, told U.S. District Judge Naomi R. Buchwald in Manhattan federal court. "I wish to publicly apologize to my family and to all those I've harmed."
Refco, once the biggest independent U.S. futures trader, collapsed in October 2005, two months after its initial public offering.
The New York firm, which also provided brokerage services, filed for bankruptcy protection days after disclosing that a Bennett-controlled firm owed hundreds of millions of dollars to Refco.
The roots of the case stretch back to 1997, when Refco began hiding massive losses sustained by clients in the Asian debt crisis.
According to the indictment, the company hid the scam from Thomas H. Lee, which paid $507 million for a 57 percent stake in Refco in 2004; from banks and debt holders that extended more than $1.4 billion in financing in 2004; and from investors who paid $583 million for shares when Refco went public.
Related listings
-
US Judge Scalia on 'So-Called Torture'
Lawyer Blogs 02/13/2008[##_1L|1192765308.jpg|width="120" height="93" alt=""|_##]Conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said on Tuesday some physical interrogation techniques can be used on a suspect in the event of an imminent threat, such as a hidden bomb ...
-
Lerach Gets Two Years In Prison for Kickbacks
Lawyer Blogs 02/12/2008[##_1L|1333308749.jpg|width="110" height="122" alt=""|_##]The soaring and incendiary career of San Diego class-action lawyer Bill Lerach came to an ignominious end yesterday, as a judge sentenced the onetime “King of the Shareholder Suit” to two year...
-
Supreme Court reinstates salmon label lawsuit
Lawyer Blogs 02/12/2008The California Supreme Court breathed new life Monday into a consumer campaign to get grocery stores to label farmed salmon that are artifically colored. The justices decided unanimously to overturn two lower court rulings tossing out the legal chall...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.