Supreme Court to hear Indiana voter ID law
Lawyer Blogs
[##_1L|1360226867.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]Democrats and Republicans square off before the Supreme Court Wednesday over a law that requires voters to produce photo identification before they can cast a ballot. The strictest voter ID law in the nation was passed by Indiana's Republican-led legislature on party-line votes and signed by its Republican governor in 2005 as a way to deter voter fraud. The Bush administration supports Indiana's law.
Democrats who are challenging the law say it uses prevention of fraud as a pretext to discourage elderly, poor and minority voters — those most likely to lack proper ID and who tend to vote for Democrats.
Opponents say there have been no Indiana prosecutions of in-person voter fraud — the kind the law is supposed to prevent.
A federal judge who upheld the voter ID law pointed out that opponents were unable to produce evidence of a single, individual Indiana resident who had been barred from voting because of the law.
Courts have upheld voter ID laws in Arizona, Georgia and Michigan, but struck down Missouri's. Wednesday's case should be decided by late June, in time for the November 2008 elections.
The justices could use the case to instruct courts on how to weigh claims of voter fraud versus those of disenfranchisement.
The Supreme Court was bitterly divided, 5-4, in 2000 in Bush v. Gore, the case that clinched the presidential election for George W. Bush.
The consolidated cases are Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, 07-21, and Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita, 07-25.
Related listings
-
Supreme Court rules against local firm
Lawyer Blogs 01/09/2008A Lapeer County gravel operation lost out to the federal government on Tuesday in a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that could influence thousands of similar cases.In a 7-2 ruling, the justices said Metamora-based John R. Sand & Gravel Co. waited too l...
-
High Court to Announce Opinions Tuesday
Lawyer Blogs 01/08/2008Several Supreme Court justices indicated yesterday that it may be difficult for them to definitely answer whether or when lethal injections violate the Constitution's protection from cruel and unusual punishment. The morning arguments before the cour...
-
Navy must cut sonar use off California
Lawyer Blogs 01/04/2008[##_1L|1369262445.jpg|width="130" height="132" alt=""|_##]A federal judge in Los Angeles on Thursday ordered the toughest set of restrictions ever imposed on the U.S. Navy's use of mid-frequency sonar off the Southern California coast as part of a pr...
Victorville CA DUI defense Attorneys
The outcome of a DUI defense will have a long-term effect on anyone’s life, making the decision to receive legal representation an easy one. The fact is, most people accused of a DUI are first offenders with no criminal background. Whether this is your first run in with the law or you have had previous convictions, you are in need of a DUI defense attorney.
The charges you are facing for a DUI range from fines, a 12-month suspension on your license and worst-case scenario, prison time. Your attorney will be able to analyze your situation to decide the best way to go about your case.
Our attorneys know the tricky ways to challenge all of the DUI tests and know how to claim improper collection of evidence. We will be able to negotiate on your behalf and free you from charges and help you keep your drivers license. The DUI process can last up to several months, we can make this process easier on you. .