Suspect pleads not guilty to shooting into truck
Lawyer Blogs
A man accused of shooting at his ex-girlfriend's truck in Livermore pleaded not guilty Wednesday.
Neal Kuopus also passed on his right to a preliminary hearing, thereby sending the case closer to a trial date.
Kuopus appeared briefly in Alameda County Superior Court and let his attorney, deputy public defender Norma Rivera, speak for him.
Rivera asked him several questions to confirm that he understood he had a right to a preliminary hearing, where a judge must decide that a crime happened and that the defendant probably was involved.
The decision to skip the hearing was somewhat of a surprise, because according to court documents, Rivera and deputy district attorney Michael Roemer previously came to an agreement that Kuopus would plead guilty to one of the charges in exchange for a prison sentence of as many as three years, as well as five years of probation.
Rivera declined to comment on the case. Roemer said he could not comment specifically on the case, either.
Roemer said it has become more common to bypass a preliminary hearing.
Kuopus is accused of firing a gun at his ex-girlfriend several times Sept. 9 before escaping in the woman's truck. He was arrested three days later after a neighbor spotted him at his home.
He faces three felony counts of shooting into an occupied vehicle.
Police said Kuopus, 56, shot at the woman after she came to his home in the 4800 block of Mulqueeney Common to reclaim possession of her truck.
After an argument inside his home, police say, he followed her out as she got inside a vehicle with her friends. Both shots missed all three people inside, but one shattered a window.
No one was hurt and the victims were able to drive away and call police.
Kuopus is set to appear in court in Hayward Dec. 11 for an arraignment.
Related listings
-
Ford Agrees to Settle Rollover Case
Lawyer Blogs 11/28/2007[##_1L|1024690655.jpg|width="130" height="93" alt=""|_##]Ford Motor Co has agreed to settle class-action litigation covering plaintiffs in four states who claimed its Explorer sport utility vehicles were prone to rollovers, Ford said on Wednesday. "F...
-
Judge removed after jailing entire court room
Lawyer Blogs 11/28/2007[##_1L|1002107402.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]A judge who jailed 46 people who were in his courtroom when a cell phone call interrupted proceedings was removed from the bench Tuesday by a state commission. Niagara Falls City Court Judge Ro...
-
High court hears case of lost 401(k) funds
Lawyer Blogs 11/27/2007Although U.S. workers can invest money in a retirement fund sponsored by their employer, it is not clear whether they can sue to recover money lost because of mistakes by the fund's administrator. That issue came before the Supreme Court on Monday in...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.