Suspects in W.Va. Torture Set for Court
Lawyer Blogs
[##_1L|1154244621.jpg|width="120" height="80" alt=""|_##]Six white people accused of holding a black woman captive while they tortured and sexually assaulted her are scheduled to make their initial court appearances this week. But the proceedings may be delayed because public defenders representing two of the defendants have recused themselves, Logan County Prosecutor Brian Abraham said.
The six defendants are charged with assaulting Megan Williams, 20, for more than a week at a ramshackle trailer in Big Creek. Police say she was tortured, sexually assaulted, forced to eat animal droppings and taunted with a racial slur.
Bobby Brewster, George Messer, Alisha Burton and Karen Burton are scheduled to appear Monday in Logan County Magistrate Court. Frankie Brewster and Danny Combs are scheduled for to appear on Tuesday.
Public defenders representing Bobby Brewster and Messer have recused themselves because they had represented some of the defendants in the past.
A public defender can't represent a defendant in this case if they have represented any of the other defendants in past cases, Logan County Magistrate Court Clerk Deeanna Briggs said.
Since 1991, police have filed 108 criminal charges against the six.
Jack Rogers, executive director of the state's public defender services, said other lawyers could be hired on short-term contracts, or attorneys could be brought in from neighboring counties.
Frankie Brewster, 49, and her son, Bobby Brewster, 24, are both charged with kidnapping and sexual assault, among other counts.
Combs, 20, of Harts, is charged with sexual assault and malicious wounding; Karen Burton, 46, of Chapmanville, is charged with malicious wounding, battery and assault during the commission of a felony; and Burton's daughter, Alisha Burton, 23, and Messer, 27, both of Chapmanville, are charged with assault during the commission of a felony and battery.
All six remain in custody in lieu of $100,000 bail each.
Betty Gregory, lawyer for Karen Burton, said Friday she intends to ask for a bond reduction for her client because the $100,000 cash bond is "grossly inappropriate."
The other lawyers representing the defendants did not immediately return telephone calls Sunday.
Because Williams is black and the defendants are white, some _ including church groups close to the Williams family _ want hate crimes charges filed, either at the state or federal level.
U.S. Attorney Charles T. Miller has said he doesn't currently plan to file civil rights charges, while Abraham said he may file new or amended charges in the days to come.
Related listings
-
State high court to review ruling on churches
Lawyer Blogs 09/13/2007[##_1L|1358712279.jpg|width="180" height="128" alt=""|_##]The California Supreme Court has voted unanimously to review a recent appeals court ruling that the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles is the owner of the buildings, prayer books and other prope...
-
Court puts hold on Qualcomm import ban
Lawyer Blogs 09/13/2007[##_1L|1113198582.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]South Korean handset makers on Thursday welcomed a US appeals court ruling that halted an import ban on mobile phones containing Qualcomm’s 3G chipsets, a legal victory in the chipmaker’s paten...
-
Craig files papers in attempt to reverse guilty plea
Lawyer Blogs 09/12/2007[##_1L|1244834161.jpg|width="130" height="94" alt=""|_##]Sen. Larry Craig has filed papers to withdraw his guilty plea in an airport sex sting, arguing that he entered the plea under stress caused by media inquiries into his sexuality. But a spokesma...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.