Texas judge's death-row appeal testimony to resume
Lawyer Blogs
A Texas judge criticized for closing her court with a condemned man's last appeal in the works is set to resume testifying at her ethics trial.
Judge Sharon Keller is telling her side of the story for the first time nearly two years after Michael Wayne Richard was executed.
She'll continue testifying Wednesday. She was first called Tuesday to answer questions about refusing to keep the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals open past 5 p.m. when Richard's lawyers asked for more time to file their rushed appeal on Sept. 25, 2007.
Keller says the move wasn't a ruling on the merits of the request.
She says she received a call shortly before court closed about an appeal running late and that she knew it concerned the execution but that no explanation was given.
Related listings
-
Supreme Court says Ga. man should get hearing
Lawyer Blogs 08/18/2009The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a new hearing for death row inmate Troy Davis, giving the condemned killer a chance to present evidence his lawyers say could clear him in the murder of an off-duty police officer almost 20 years ago. The court tol...
-
Supreme Court says Georgia man should get hearing
Lawyer Blogs 08/17/2009The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a new hearing for death row inmate Troy Davis, whose supporters say is innocent and should be spared from execution for killing a police officer 20 years ago. Davis has spent 18 years on death row for the 1989 slay...
-
Broncos' Marshall found not guilty in battery case
Lawyer Blogs 08/16/2009A jury in Atlanta found Denver Broncos wide receiver Brandon Marshall not guilty of misdemeanor battery against his former girlfriend, announcing its verdict Friday after about an hour of deliberations. Marshall had faced two counts of simple battery...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.