U.S. court rules for India in New York tax dispute
Lawyer Blogs
A U.S. Appeals Court ruled on Tuesday against New York City in its long-running dispute with India and Mongolia over whether they owe about $47 million in taxes on property that houses staff assigned to consulates and United Nations missions.
The demands by the city that hosts the United Nations headquarters for property taxes from several foreign governments had become an irritant in diplomatic relations, according to a U.S. Department of State notice cited by the three-judge panel.
The June 2009 notice granted an exemption from property taxes on property owned by foreign governments and used to accommodate their personnel in the United States. The City of New York argued the properties should be taxable, despite the department's order under the Foreign Missions Act.
Related listings
-
Infamous NY child molest case may get new look
Lawyer Blogs 08/17/2010A man who has been trying for decades to take back his guilty plea in a notorious child molestation case won a huge moral victory Monday when a federal appeals court encouraged prosecutors to reopen their investigation.Although the judges on the 2nd ...
-
Court says California mall's chat policy illegal
Lawyer Blogs 08/16/2010A Northern California appeals court has struck down a shopping mall's policy barring people from approaching strangers to chitchat.The 3rd District Court of Appeal this week said the rules at Roseville's Westfield Galleria violate the California Cons...
-
Federal appeals court in NY rules against ACORN
Lawyer Blogs 08/13/2010A federal appeals court in New York City has thrown out a decision that barred Congress from withholding funds from the activist group ACORN.The ruling Friday reverses a decision by a district court. That judge found Congress had violated ACORN's rig...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c1e9/4c1e951dfb9275feb84157b10a809203976a7665" alt=""
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.