US court to hear appeal by Guantanamo prisoners
Lawyer Blogs
[##_1L|1175459935.jpg|width="120" height="84" alt=""|_##]The U.S. Supreme Court said on Friday it would hear appeals by Guantanamo prisoners on their right to challenge their confinement before federal judges, a test of President George W. Bush's powers in the war on terrorism. The court in April had denied the same appeals by the prisoners, but the justices in a brief order changed their minds and said they would hear and decide the two cases during the court's term that starts in October.
At issue is an anti-terrorism law that Bush pushed through Congress last year taking away the right of the foreign terrorist suspects held at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba to have a judicial review of their detention.
The decision by the court to hear the two cases was a setback for the Bush administration which had urged the justices to turn down the appeals.
There are about 375 detainees now at the prison which critics, including some of Washington's allies, have demanded be closed. The first arrived more than five years ago after the United States launched its war on terrorism in response to the Sept. 11 attacks.
The indefinite detention and allegations of prisoner mistreatment at Guantanamo, which the U.S. military denies, have tarnished the U.S. image abroad. Human rights groups have demanded Guantanamo be closed and detainees charged with crimes or released.
Three of the nine justices in April dissented from the decision to reject the appeals by the Guantanamo prisoners. The high court on Friday gave no explanation for its reversal in now deciding to hear the cases.
After the appeals had been rejected in April, lawyers for the prisoners asked the court to reconsider, and the court on Friday agreed. It has been the first time in decades the high court has granted such a request.
The Supreme Court's action in the Guantanamo cases was announced the day after the justices had ended their 2006-2007 term.
Related listings
-
Court rejects public school diversity plans
Lawyer Blogs 06/28/2007[##_1L|1182397276.jpg|width="180" height="122" alt=""|_##]A bitterly divided U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday issued what is likely to be a landmark opinion -- ruling that race cannot be a factor in the assignment of children to public schools. The cou...
-
3 ex-Countrywide execs to plead guilty
Lawyer Blogs 06/27/2007[##_1L|1080197920.jpg|width="101" height="102" alt=""|_##]Three former Countrywide Financial Corp. executives agreed Tuesday to plead guilty to trading on their inside knowledge that the giant mortgage company's earnings in the third quarter of 2004 ...
-
Man Pleads Guilty to Holding Girl Captive for 10 Years
Lawyer Blogs 06/27/2007[##_1L|1408439683.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]A former middle school security guard pleaded guilty today to holding a student captive in his house for 10 years and forcing her to have sex with him. Thomas Hose, 49, was sentenced to a maxim...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.