Court won't get involved Massachusetts tax fight
Lawyer News
The Supreme Court won't stop Massachusetts from taxing out-of-state corporations that work in that state but don't have in-state buildings or employees.
The court refused on Monday to hear an appeal from Capital One Bank and Geoffrey, Inc., a subsidiary of Toys R Us that licenses the company's giraffe logo and other trademarks.
Massachusetts tax officials say both companies make money in-state, and therefore should pay state taxes. The companies say that the Commerce Clause of the Constitution prohibits state officials from taxing out-of-state companies that do not have a physical presence in that state.
States normally are not allowed to tax out-of-state corporations who do not have a physical presence in those states. Massachusetts's top court ruled, however, that it could tax out-of-state corporations if they have a "substantial nexus" in a state.
CapitalOne banks are based out of Virginia, but offers credit cards that are used by people in Massachusetts and uses collection agencies in that state to go after delinquent accounts. Geoffrey, Inc., licenses the use of Toys R Us trademarks for its stores in Massachusetts.
The cases are Geoffrey, Inc., v. Commissioner of Revenue, 08-1207 and CapitalOne Bank v. Commissioner of Revenue, 08-1169.
Related listings
-
Ga. court: Travel Web site shorting city on tax
Lawyer News 06/16/2009The Georgia Supreme Court concluded Monday that the online travel company Expedia Inc. has shortchanged a west Georgia city on hotel and occupancy taxes. The court's 4-3 ruling — the first such decision by Georgia's top appellate court — found that E...
-
Obama to crack down on business taxes
Lawyer News 05/04/2009President Barack Obama plans changes to tax policy certain to be unpopular with corporations with international divisions and individuals who use tax havens. Obama's two-part plan, which he will announce later Monday at the White House, also embraces...
-
Appeals court rejects tax case of McVeigh's lawyer
Lawyer News 03/31/2009An appeals court affirmed Timothy McVeigh's lawyer cannot claim a charitable tax deduction for donating prosecution materials from the Oklahoma City bombing case. The three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday upheld a tax court...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.