Fight over Vt. nuclear plant oversight in NY court
Lawyer News
The question of whether Vermont's only nuclear plant can continue operating without the approval of state regulators goes before a federal appeals court Monday in a dispute that has gained increasing attention nationally about the boundaries of federal authority over a controversial power source.
The New Orleans-based Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. brought the issue to court. The utility won a decision last January in which a federal judge in Brattleboro, Vt., ruled that safety issues are the sole responsibility of the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In 2011, that panel had extended the license for Entergy's Vermont Yankee plant by 20 years. Without the judge's ruling, the plant could have been forced to close on March 21, when state approval expires.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan took up the case on an expedited schedule, and a ruling from the three-judge panel that will hear arguments Monday could be expected within weeks rather than months.
At stake is a plant that opened in 1972 and supplies one-third of the electricity consumed by Vermont, with about 45 percent of the power generated at the plant being shipped to electric companies in neighboring states.
In written arguments submitted before Monday's hearing, lawyers for Vermont officials said that even the NRC acknowledged when it relicensed the plant that state regulators will "ultimately decide" whether the plant continues to operate. The lawyers noted that the dispute originates in a state that has become "a national leader in promoting energy efficiency" as it has for decades engaged in moves away from oil, gas and nuclear to such renewable energy sources as solar, wind and biomass.
Related listings
-
UK murder suspect's extradition case set for 2013
Lawyer News 12/11/2012A U.K. court will wait until next year to hold the extradition hearing of a Briton accused of hiring a hit man to kill his wife during their honeymoon in South Africa — after his mental state is reviewed. The lawyer for Shrien Dewani says he has flas...
-
Former US Attorney taking job at law firm in Chicago
Lawyer News 11/06/2012Former U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald has a new job. Fitzgerald plans to join Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Fitzgerald will become a partner in the corporate law firm's Chicago office on Oct. 29. Ads by GoogleDuring his tenure as U....
-
New front expected in fight over Arizona law
Lawyer News 06/10/2012An upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision, which is expected to uphold the most controversial part of Arizona's immigration law, won't end disputes over whether local police can enforce immigration law. Instead, it's likely to ignite a renewed assault ...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.