IRS says Enron stock can't be deducted as theft losses
Lawyer News
[##_1L|1313277619.jpg|width="128" height="81" alt=""|_##]Q: We still own Enron stock and qualify for the reimbursement package that was mailed to investors this week. My question: Can we deduct the losses not covered by the reimbursement as theft losses on our taxes next year? At what point does a capital loss become a theft loss?
A: No, you cannot deduct as theft losses the amount you invested in Enron stock that is not covered by the reimbursement.
The Internal Revenue Service stated in an April 19, 2004, notice that it would "disallow such deductions and may impose penalties" on taxpayers who claimed theft loss deductions for "the decline in market value of their stock caused by disclosure of accounting fraud or other illegal misconduct of the officers or directors of the corporation that issued the stock."
The tax code limits losses for individuals to:
• Losses incurred in a trade or business.
• Losses incurred in any transaction entered into for profit outside of a trade or business, which are called capital losses.
• Losses of property not connected with a trade or business or a transaction entered into for profit, if such losses arise from theft or casualties, such as fire, storm and shipwreck, which are called theft or casualty losses.
In its notice, the IRS cites several judicial rulings that have found that capital losses do not become theft losses, even when a stock becomes worthless because of "corporate officers misrepresenting the financial condition of the corporation, even when the officers were indicted for securities fraud or other criminal violations."
You can challenge that determination by filing a lawsuit and proving in court that the "loss resulted from a taking of property that is illegal under the law of the state where it occurred and that the taking was done with criminal intent."
Otherwise, claim a capital loss.
Capital losses are deducted first from capital gains, and then again up to $3,000 of other income. Any amounts of the loss remaining can be carried over into future tax years. A carry-over loss may be deducted from capital gains in later years plus up to $3,000 of ordinary income.
Related listings
-
Don't throw away your tax-exempt status
Lawyer News 01/23/2008Small tax-exempt organizations have a new filing requirement. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 made some big changes to the tax law as it affects charities, particularly the operation of tax-exempt charitable organizations. It included new rules fo...
-
IRS audited 1 out of every 11 millionaires in 2007
Lawyer News 01/18/2008There's at least one advantage to not being a millionaire — less chance of being audited by the Internal Revenue Service.The tax agency said Thursday that in the 2007 budget year it audited one out of every 11 with incomes of $1 million or more. Amon...
-
Late Tax Law Changes Affect Some Workers
Lawyer News 01/17/2008[##_1L|1379409163.jpg|width="128" height="81" alt=""|_##]Americans who claim tax credits for child care expenses, college costs or home energy updates may have to wait a while for their refund checks from the IRS this year. That's because Congress di...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.