IRS sues St. Louis tax lawyer over fraud claim
Lawyer News
The federal government is trying to bar a financial attorney from offering alleged fraudulent tax saving schemes that help wealthy clients, many of them in the St. Louis area, according to a suit filed Monday in U.S. District Court here.
In the suit, the Internal Revenue Service asks the court to forbid St. Louis attorney Philip A. Kaiser and others affiliated with him from promoting fraudulent tax schemes. The suit says those schemes include:
- sham transactions claiming "massive" charitable deductions, with little or no money going to legitimate charities;
- evasion of federal income tax on gains from stock sales by disguising the sales as loans;
- illegal circumvention of contribution limits for Roth IRAs;
- and evasion of income tax on business earnings by using transactions with sham corporations.
Related listings
-
Tax service drops legal action against Portsmouth
Lawyer News 03/16/2010Portsmouth's survival hopes have been helped by Britain's tax authority dropping a legal challenge against the club entering a form of bankruptcy protection.London's High Court on Tuesday suspended a winding-up order against the debt-ridden Premier L...
-
Court turns down energy company over Okla. taxes
Lawyer News 03/01/2010The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from an energy company over a court ruling that could allow counties in Oklahoma to collect taxes on natural gas that is shipped by pipelines that run through the counties.The justices did not comment Monday o...
-
Appeals court rejects Ky. online hotel tax suit
Lawyer News 12/24/2009A federal appeals court has upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit in which Louisville and Lexington officials tried to collect taxes from hundreds of online hotel brokers such as Hotels.com.The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Tuesday that Kent...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.