Court says statements in assault case can be used
Legal News Center
The Iowa Court of Appeals says a district court judge was wrong to suppress statements made to police by a man who walked into a police station saying he may have sexually assaulted a teenage girl.
Wednesday's decision allows prosecutors to continue their case against Ounheaun (OON'-yen) Cam, who is charged with assault with intent to commit sexual abuse.
Cam argued his statements to a Sioux Center police officer should have been suppressed because he was in custody and didn't knowingly waive his right to an attorney.
The appeals court found Cam was not in custody and did not ask about an attorney until after he had spoken to police.
Related listings
-
Court: Exonerated inmate doesn't get $14 million
Legal News Center 03/29/2011The Supreme Court has overturned a $14 million judgment given to a former death row inmate who accused New Orleans prosecutors of withholding evidence in order to help convict him of murder.John Thompson had successfully sued the district attorney's ...
-
Oregon appeals court: Teeth not dangerous weapon
Legal News Center 03/24/2011The Oregon Court of Appeals has ruled that teeth are not a dangerous weapon.The decision Wednesday overturned a first-degree assault conviction for a Marion County man who bit off part of a neighbor's ear in 2008 in a drunken fight.The Oregonian repo...
-
NY top court weighs sex offender's return home
Legal News Center 03/22/2011New York's top court will decide whether a convicted sex offender's return home constitutes child neglect by him and his wife even though there was no evidence he did anything inappropriate with his children.The Court of Appeals is set to hear argume...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c1e9/4c1e951dfb9275feb84157b10a809203976a7665" alt=""
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.