Fed. judge says courts can handle Gitmo cases
Legal News Center
A federal judge who presided over the trial of a 9/11 conspirator said Thursday that civilian courts are capable of handling the cases of Guantanamo Bay detainees.
U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema told a gathering at the University of Virginia law school that the courts' ability to handle even the most complicated terrorism cases was demonstrated by the prosecution of terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui in her courtroom.
She also said the government should not abuse classification procedures to suppress information about mistreatment of detainees. She said it's been her experience that much of what the government seeks to keep classified has more to do with avoiding embarrassment than divulging secrets.
"As embarrassing and as ugly as some of this information might be, it is not in my view national security information," she said.
Her remarks come as the Obama administration decides what to do with detainees at Guantanamo, which it wants to close by January 2010.
One option is to bring suspected terrorists to trial in the United States, though some critics have questioned whether traditional courts can handle the volume of classified information involved. Some argue that military courts or a some sort of hybrid national security court would provide a better forum.
Related listings
-
DA says NY mortgage fraud had link to S&M club
Legal News Center 03/27/2009Five people, including a former county legislator and a woman said to be a dominatrix, are facing charges they participated in a $50 million mortgage fraud scheme involving several dozen Hamptons properties over the past seven years. The frauds invol...
-
Peter Madoff’s Assets Frozen by Judge in Investor’s Lawsuit
Legal News Center 03/26/2009The brother of convicted Ponzi scheme mastermind Bernard Madoff had his assets frozen by a New York state judge as part of a $2 million lawsuit filed by an investor who lost $470,000 in Madoff’s fraud. New York Supreme Court Justice Stephen Bucaria y...
-
Arizona high court rejects private school vouchers
Legal News Center 03/26/2009The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that two school voucher programs violate the state's constitution. The vouchers have helped cover the cost of private school for foster children and disabled students. The justices ruled Wednesday that the programs...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.