Judge delays case involving FBI's GPS tracking
Legal News Center
A federal judge is delaying a college student's lawsuit against the FBI for putting a GPS tracking device on his car without a warrant.
The student, Yasir Afifi of San Jose, Calif., asked for the delay until the Supreme Court decides a related case. The high court plans to hear arguments in the next term over the case of Washington nightclub owner Antoine Jones, convicted of operating a cocaine distribution ring. An appeals court threw out Jones' life sentence because police tracked his Jeep for a month by GPS without a warrant.
Other courts have upheld the use of warrantless GPS tracking.
The FBI admits it put the GPS on Afifi's car, but won't publicly reveal why. The Egyptian-American student says he never did anything to attract the FBI's attention.
Related listings
-
Ga. court upholds Open Meetings fines
Legal News Center 09/12/2011Georgia's top court is requiring the city of Statesboro to pay the legal costs of residents who sued it for violating the state's Open Meetings Act. The unanimous opinion released Monday upholds a Bulloch County judge's ruling that requires the city ...
-
W.Va. lawyer nominated to federal appeals court
Legal News Center 09/09/2011President Barack Obama has nominated Hamlin native Stephanie Dawn Thacker as a judge on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Thacker has been a partner in the Charleston law firm of Guthrie & Thomas since 2006. Before that she spent seven years...
-
Calif court mulls appeal rights of Prop 8 backers
Legal News Center 09/07/2011California's same-sex marriage ban endured its latest legal test Tuesday as the state's high court grilled attorneys on whether Proposition 8's backers have legal authority to appeal a federal ruling that overturned the voter-approved measure.The ten...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.