Levy admits diverting $7 million from fund
Legal News Center
[##_1L|1209932041.jpg|width="180" height="128" alt=""|_##]A partner in a San Diego hedge fund that allegedly bilked investors out of up to $60 million pleaded guilty in federal court yesterday to tax evasion and conspiracy to commit mail fraud. Paul Henrie Levy, co-manager of Global Money Management before it collapsed in March 2004, reversed his prior plea of not guilty in a hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo.
Levy, who was indicted in 2005, is scheduled to be sentenced Oct. 15. He could receive a maximum of eight years in prison on the two charges, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Phil Halpern.
"The saga of Global Money Management demonstrates once again that fraudsters can steal money using e-mails, letters and stock solicitations rather than guns," Halpern said. "We must be vigilant for this type of fraud, which causes so much harm to so many."
Two other people indicted in the case – GMM fund co-manager Marvin Irwin Friedman and bookkeeper Alice Mae Swiderski – previously pleaded guilty and are awaiting sentencing.
In his plea agreement, Levy admitted diverting up to $7 million in GMM investor money to entities he controlled for his own personal use. He also filed false tax returns for the years 2001, 2002 and 2003 that resulted in a tax loss to the government of about $2.3 million, according to court documents.
Beginning in at least 1997, Levy and Friedman solicited investors through word of mouth, referrals from family members and, later, by soliciting institutional investors through referrals from investment banking firms, according to court documents.
Levy and Friedman touted the successful performance of the GMM hedge fund, claiming it was making substantial returns that averaged 25 percent annually. The partners also claimed not to charge any fees for managing the fund but instead to receive a share of profits generated by the GMM fund.
Prosecutors alleged the hedge fund was little more than a Ponzi scheme, in which the two men used new investor funds to pay off longer-term investors in an attempt to induce those individuals to invest more in the fund. The partners also diverted funds to pay their personal expenses and to benefit other corporate entities they controlled.
Global Money Management collapsed in March 2004, shortly after the Securities and Exchange Commission sued GMM, its general partner LF Global Investments and controlling director Friedman for securities fraud.
At the urging of the SEC, a judge froze the partnership's assets and turned GMM over to court-appointed receiver Charles La Bella. At the time, La Bella found less than $50,000 in assets in the partnership, which once purported to control $116 million on behalf of about 200 investors.
In earlier court documents, prosecutors said La Bella traced more than $18 million in investor funds to accounts controlled by Levy, including at least one account in Switzerland.
Halpern said the government now believes it has recovered any money that wasn't "dissipated" by partners Levy and Friedman.
Ronald Krajewski, acting assistant special agent in charge for the San Diego office of the Internal Revenue Service, said the agency, which investigated the case with the Department of Justice, will "aggressively pursue" individuals who take financial advantage of clients and evade their income taxes.
"Investment professionals who have betrayed their clients' trust and placed their own personal monetary gain ahead of their clients' financial well-being will be prosecuted," Krajewski said.
Related listings
-
Court: Judges Need All Detainee Evidence
Legal News Center 07/20/2007[##_1L|1254227088.jpg|width="120" height="84" alt=""|_##]When Guantanamo Bay detainees challenge their status as "enemy combatants," judges must review all the evidence, not just what the military chooses, a federal appeals court ruled Friday. The U....
-
SEC tackles muni bond regulation
Legal News Center 07/19/2007[##_1L|1023466887.jpg|width="130" height="128" alt=""|_##]Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday addressed a yawning gap in regulation of the $2,400bn US municipal bond market by calling for laws to broaden ...
-
Court Sends Vioxx Suits Back to Judge
Legal News Center 07/19/2007[##_1L|1237072732.jpg|width="140" height="103" alt=""|_##]A federal appeals court revived a group of shareholder lawsuits that accused Merck & Co. officers and directors of violating their duties by concealing the health risks of the company's Vi...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6329/f6329d5dab884639b4ddc9c697286fb8c13d691c" alt=""
Illinois Work Injury Lawyers – Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD.
Accidents in the workplace are often caused by unsafe work conditions arising from ignoring safety rules, overlooking maintenance or other negligence of those in management. While we are one of the largest firms in Illinois dedicated solely to the representation of injured workers, we pride ourselves on the personal, one-on-one approach we deliver to each client.
Work accidents can cause serious injuries and sometimes permanent damage. Some extremely serious work injuries can permanently hinder a person’s ability to get around and continue their daily duties. Factors that affect one’s quality of life such as place of work, relationships with friends and family, and social standing can all be taken away quickly by a work injury. Although, you may not be able to recover all of your losses, you may be entitled to compensation as a result of your work injury. Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD. provides informed advocacy in all kinds of workers’ compensation claims, including:
• Injuries to the back and neck, including severe spinal cord injuries
• Serious head injuries
• Heart problems resulting from workplace activities
• Injuries to the knees, elbows, shoulders and other joints
• Injuries caused by repetitive movements
For Illinois Workers’ Compensation claims, you will ALWAYS cheat yourself if you do not hire an experienced attorney. When you hire Krol, Bongiorno & Given, Ltd, you will have someone to guide you through the process, and when it is time to settle, we will add value to your case IN EXCESS of our fee. In the last few years, employers and insurance carriers have sought to advance the argument that when you settle a case without an attorney, your already low settlement should be further reduced by 20% so that you do not get a “windfall.” Representing yourself in Illinois is a lose-lose proposition.