Utah Supreme Court: Online petition signatures OK

Legal News Center

The Utah Supreme Court says state election officials must accept online petition signatures that are turned in to get individuals on the ballot.

The justices announced the unanimous decision Tuesday as voters went to the polls for primary elections.

The issue was raised by an independent candidate for governor. Farley Anderson's paperwork included more than 150 e-signatures and was rejected by the lieutenant governor's office.

Utah law acknowledges that electronic signatures are valid substitutes for handwritten ones, but the state attorney general's office argued that e-signatures could not be counted because election law only contemplates a paper-based system.

Farley's attorney argued that the state denied Farley his constitutional right to ballot access.

Related listings

  • Summary of actions by the Supreme Court on Monday

    Summary of actions by the Supreme Court on Monday

    Legal News Center 06/22/2010

    The Supreme Court on Monday:_Upheld a federal law that bars "material support" to foreign terrorist organizations, rejecting a free speech challenge from humanitarian aid groups. The court ruled 6-3 that the government may prohibit all forms of aid t...

  • High court to review mental health advocacy suit

    High court to review mental health advocacy suit

    Legal News Center 06/21/2010

    The Supreme Court says it will decide whether Virginia's advocate for the mentally ill can force state officials to provide records relating to deaths and injuries at state mental health facilities.The justices agreed Monday to review a federal appea...

  • Ex-NYC crane inspector gets 2-6 years for bribery

    Ex-NYC crane inspector gets 2-6 years for bribery

    Legal News Center 06/17/2010

    The city's former chief crane inspector apologized at his sentencing Wednesday for taking bribes to fake inspection and licensing exam results and said other inspectors didn't deserve the notoriety he brought them.James Delayo was sentenced in Manhat...

Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?

IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.

Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.

Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read